Originally Posted by Rebelman
It isn't not a poor analogy. It is exactly the situation. He is the Director for a reason. If he does a poor job, he'll be fired.

Where is the politics in game check? Y'all are full of chit. It is 2016. Finally Alabama is making a move in the right direction. Data is the first step. Or I suppose we could continue the riding the pendulum and never has long term success.


THIS^^^

Thank you Reb, I said the same thing! We have had regulations since we've been hunting deer, and there will be continued regulation whether we have GC or not, so how can it possibly hurt to make those regulations based on MORE information than they were previously making them with????

The general sentiment here is as if up until now you could just kill however many of whatever critter you wanted to kill anytime you wanted to kill it, but now somebody is limiting those rules out of nowhere. I didn't see this much tinfoil hat crap when they passed the 3 buck rule several years ago. GameCheck has not (yet) created one single rule that we didn't already have. We all bitched about how there was no teeth to the state laws already in place, and GameCheck is at worst only a matter of "teeth", not an added restrictive rule. I've said forever that the ONLY way you can manage is to localize the decisions (by county), and GC will lead to that.


We were on the edge of Eternia, when the power of Greyskull began to take hold.