I didn't see the debate, so how did the topic come up? It sounded like to me that Hillary was suggesting that Trump wants to expand Stop and Frisk beyond the Terry decision.

There hasn't been an issue with the constitutionality of a Terry Stop since the decision. The only issues that are generally involved are if there was "reasonable suspicion" and whether or not the pat down was too invasive.

I guess that explains why Hillary couldn't pass the D.C. bar exam.