Actually there are two different scenarios. One the "private scenario where a person/persons have provided/or provide their own effort/capital/funds and assumed all of the risk. Or, scenario 2 where a company is "public" and uses others effort/capital/funds without personal risk.

Under scenario one no limits what so ever. Scenario 2 that is ripe for corruption and theft of others (read outsiders) moneys that have been solicited through any means necessary including lying/deceit (read Richard Scrushy, etc) and complicit "independent" boards of directors (all Insiders, again think Healthsouth) yes there should be limits on how compensation, incentives and golden parachutes can be structured.

Obviously the difference is personal risk and reward versus no personal risk and reward.

Last edited by Fun4all; 09/09/16 08:54 AM.
"After all, it is not the killing that brings satisfaction; it is the contest of skill and cunning. The true hunter counts his achievement in proportion to the effort involved and the fairness of the sport." Dr. Saxton Pope