|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
62 registered members (SuperSpike, alhawk, weatherby, canichols424, Cynical, Bustinbeards, Cuz-Pat, twaldrop4, Gunner211, Mack1, jwalker77, BentBarrel, BhamFred, klay, BCLC, brianr, AUjerbear, Chiller, Pwyse, Frankie, mcninja, jericward, Tailwalk7, k bush, PossumPecker, BrandonClark, Dubie, !shiloh!, RebFormanUDA, akbejeepin, quailman, ALrifleman, Morris, CNC, fish_blackbass, BobK, Bamarich2, CarbonClimber1, AU coonhunter, imadeerhntr, blade, TDog93, booner, mathews prostaff, BrentsFX4, BOFF, Claims Rep., dustymac, LostinTX, 3006bullet, CrappieMan, Backwards cowboy, Shmoe, JCL, Hotrod20, 7 invisible),
1,059
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Maternity leave at work?
[Re: Clem]
#1840037
09/09/16 06:58 AM
09/09/16 06:58 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,292
Conecuh county
hallb
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 11,292
Conecuh county
|
6 weeks is ridiculous 12 weeks I'd find a reason to let them go when they got back. I understand you need time to spend with kids but you've also got a responsibility to the people you work for Anyone with balls would sue you to Kingdom Come and likely win easily if you retaliated in this way. And should. I obviously have no clue b/c I'm no lawyer, but I thought at-will employment meant you could be fired for any reason. So, if a few months after getting back from your FMLA leave, you got fired, how in the heck is that going to be proven to be tied to your FMLA time off? To me, taking 12 weeks off for any reason, just shows your employer how they are able to get along without you just fine at work...
|
|
|
|
