|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
59 registered members (Chiller, BrandonClark, Frankie, weatherby, klay, Dubie, BCLC, !shiloh!, RebFormanUDA, akbejeepin, quailman, Cuz-Pat, ALrifleman, Morris, CNC, fish_blackbass, BobK, Bamarich2, CarbonClimber1, AU coonhunter, imadeerhntr, blade, TDog93, booner, Pwyse, mathews prostaff, BrentsFX4, BOFF, Claims Rep., dustymac, LostinTX, 3006bullet, CrappieMan, Backwards cowboy, Shmoe, JCL, Hotrod20, Narrow Gap, Tailwalk7, Peach, BradB, Bustinbeards, jeffhhub, NonTypical, BearBranch, BamaBoHunter, AUjerbear, Ten37, 11 invisible),
1,080
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Maternity leave at work?
[Re: Beadlescomb]
#1839795
09/09/16 01:36 AM
09/09/16 01:36 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 33,437
Your mom’s house
doekiller
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 33,437
Your mom’s house
|
When my son was born I didn't miss a day. Showed up at the hospital a little before the c section stayed up all night with her and Jordan I was back at work the next morning. 6 weeks is ridiculous 12 weeks I'd find a reason to let them go when they got back. I understand you need time to spend with kids but you've also got a responsibility to the people you work for Then you would end up in court. Not nessecarily. Okay. I'm sure your correct. No one would ever sue you for retaliatory discharge for taking a leave given to them by federal law. I have never defended those cases because no one would ever be smart enough to figure out the real reason you fired them. No jury would ever see their employee file and see they had no issues or write ups before they took their leave and think you started looking for reasons to fire them. Your right, I'm sure you are correct. I don't know what I am talking about. I should always assume you know more about the law than I do.
|
|
|
|
