|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
56 registered members (icducks, coosabuckhunter, Young20, Turkey, Johnal3, RockFarmer, BrentsFX4, hue, dtmwtp, WINMAG300, eskimo270, CouchNapper, jacannon, ts1979flh, TurkeyJoe, Khitzeman, CNC, woodleyrd, !shiloh!, dave260rem!, tallapoosa, Ten37, Catbird, Geeb, burbank, mdavis, hoggin, BayedUp, Jus_me, BobK, scrape, canine933, sj22, 3Gs, Ray_Coon, Irishguy, booner, ronfromramer, Joe4majors, M48scout, Bushmaster, NoHuntin, Mbrock, jhardy, grundan, fi8shmasty, jwalker77, wk2hnt, jsubrett6, doublefistful, mathews prostaff, 5 invisible),
1,078
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Hog population data
[Re: ElkHunter]
#1722100
04/22/16 02:35 AM
04/22/16 02:35 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 12,982
Tuscaloosa
Geno
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 12,982
Tuscaloosa
|
I could see how the estimates might be skewed to the low side.
You guys average about three a trip where I average that in a year.
Again, access to land with a dense population is the difference. Also some difference on geographic land use. It's a lot harder to hunt them in a national forest that's all thicket and hills than on a 10,000 acre row crop farm.
Whoever is happy will make others happy too. Anne Frank
|
|
|
|
