Ha...speaking of "disappointed in our leaders"...

I'm more worried about the"safe gun technologies",finger print scanners and micro chips on guns. No body will be able to afford one.

I see Trox being directly affected by this because I'm sure the same rules will apply to trades

Seems they are making a pretty big push against the Gun Trusts.

“Numbers are relevant. The ATF and DOJ did not identify a magic number of weapons that makes you engaged in the business because that would limit their ability to bring prosecution.”

Jarret then said that selling as few as “two firearms” could require somebody to obtain a federal firearms license. However, later in the call, Attorney General Lynch revised that number down further. “It can be as few as one or two depending upon the circumstances under which the person sells the gun,” Lynch said.

And I am telling you that in order to have an FFL under the law (what congress passed and he can't change) you have to be in the business of selling firearms. Now, it could be that you have only sold 1 or 2, but you are offering dozens for sale at one time. In that circumstance, the court would look at the totality of circumstances.

There has never been a magic number of gun sales to trigger a FFL. It has always been "if you are engaged in the business of buying and selling firearms."

You guys are missing the "engaged in business" part. There are a lot of people that are in the business of selling firearms that don't have FFLs. We have had a few try it on here and they were banned. You see them at flea markets or gun shows. They have a booth, they are there every time, travel to different shows and they are selling guns every time. There was one this weekend in Birmingham that actually had a sign that said, no FFL, No Background check required.

Those type guys should be regulated, they are the ones selling guns to felons. Hell, the guy was practically saying come buy from me if you can't pass a background check.

I do not read any of this to apply to individual sellers. It will be used to crack down on guys who buy and sell guns all the time, who set up booths at flea markets and who travel from gun show to gun show but don't have an FFL.

And I am telling you that in order to have an FFL under the law (what congress passed and he can't change) you have to be in the business of selling firearms. Now, it could be that you have only sold 1 or 2, but you are offering dozens for sale at one time. In that circumstance, the court would look at the totality of circumstances.

There has never been a magic number of gun sales to trigger a FFL. It has always been "if you are engaged in the business of buying and selling firearms."

You guys are missing the "engaged in business" part. There are a lot of people that are in the business of selling firearms that don't have FFLs. We have had a few try it on here and they were banned. You see them at flea markets or gun shows. They have a booth, they are there every time, travel to different shows and they are selling guns every time. There was one this weekend in Birmingham that actually had a sign that said, no FFL, No Background check required.

Those type guys should be regulated, they are the ones selling guns to felons. Hell, the guy was practically saying come buy from me if you can't pass a background check.