If you believe:
1. Evolution is a load of BS
2. Shooting a cull buck makes the deer population better, in terms of antlers,
Then these two beliefs are inconsistent with one another.
Again, you're confusing evolution which is a gradual, natural, genetic change with artificial selection which is an attempt to promote desirable traits by removing those animals that lack them.
Call it what you want. Evolutionists would say the gazelle got so fast because of the cheetah, right? Well what happened to those slow gazelles? They got eaten! The slow genes didn't get carried on. Well with the cull buck theory, where do all the small antler genes go? They die off at the end of a gun, no different than a cheetah, in the end. Dead is dead.
Please tell me if you think I'm wrong, and how. I think it is very interesting (regardless of whether I actually believe it)
