However what real evidence can the GW present. His opinion against bucky's. That is all. hell he can't even present a weapon. He did not take bucky's. It has been proven time and time again. In a case like this, how can there not be reasonable doubt.
If bucky gets on the stand and says he was walking back to his car. And the game warden says he never made a move to harm a deer. Well you tell me what he done wrong? A loaded weapon? Whatever. The law does not say that a loaded weapon constitutes hunting.
The States Definition of HUNTING.
Hunting includes pursuing, shooting, killing, capturing and trapping wild animals, wild fowl, wild birds, and all lesser acts, such as disturbing, harrying or worrying, or placing, setting, drawing, or using any device used to take wild animals, wild fowl, wild birds, whether they result in taking or not, and includes every act of assistance to any person in taking or attempting to take wild animals, wild fowl, or wild birds. OR WALKING DOWN THE ROAD/RAIL ROAD WITH A LOADED GUN.
