And I even supported the 3-buck limit. In hindsight, I wish I'd known better.

I'd rather be able to make my own decisions about what I need or want without having someone who thinks "three bucks are enough for anyone" impose more regulations. Or even "one buck is enough for you" ... who are they are they to tell me what I need/want for my property?

I've yet to see a single biologically-proven benefit whatsoever to the population with a 1/2/3-buck limit in any state other than (a) more hunters spending money, (b) more giant bucks, which leads to the first thing. If there is a legitimate biological benefit to the wild free-range population by having more 4- and older-year-old bucks, let's see it. I'd love to see it.

Just let me hunt legally and within what I believe is needed for my property, and leave me the hell alone.


"Hunting Politics are stupid!" - Farm Hunter

"Bible says you shouldn't put sugar in your cornbread." Dustin, 2013

"Best I can figure 97.365% of the general public is a paint chip eating, mouth breathing, certified dumbass." BCLC, 2020