Originally Posted By: mirage243
If you read the article from Petersens Hunting Journal it clearly states that they didn't know it was an escaped deer, and for those claiming she was gonna get sued for it, the owners of the deer state in the article that they are letting her keep it and are happy for her.


2 different stories. I posted the link to the Peterson story to show that the owner of the escaped deer COULD sue for compensation for the animal. The ones in this story chose not to. And, yes, she didn't know it was an escaped farmed deer. The boy in the current story knew what he was doing and could still get sued for it.


"Political debate: when charlatans come together to discuss their principles"
-
Bauvard