|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
70 registered members (taggedout, AU338MAG, Fullthrottle, WhoMe, abamadude, Ron A., Zbrann, weatherby, Jstocks, rrice0725, walt4dun, Pwyse, metalmuncher, Mansfield, HSV. HUNTER, jmj120, Frankie, BamaGuitarDude, kyles, slim68, brianr, Morris, dwaugh, Catbird, Skinner, slippinlipjr, CatfishJunkie, Hunter454, WEMOhunter, Sasquatch Lives, BigEd, GomerPyle, M48scout, hunter84, BPI, Bmyers142, Showout, BCLC, Herdbull, Floorman1, cartervj, zwick, jwalker77, Squeaky, BearBranch, Turkey, UncleHuck, Luxfisher, 7PTSPREAD, SouthBamaSlayer, Etyson, imadeerhntr, furnfeather, scrape, odocoileus, Okatuppa, dave260rem!, Dubie, Geeb, Jtide, Fishduck, PapaD, skoor, 7 invisible),
1,055
guests, and 0
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Would you support?
[Re: Jtide]
#1113894
10/16/14 05:44 AM
10/16/14 05:44 AM
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670
NW Alabama
R_H_Clark
Leupold Pro Staff
|
Leupold Pro Staff
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670
NW Alabama
|
The question presented in this post, is not about whether taxes should be enough to provide public land opportunities. It is about why should one group of public land users pay, but another does not. Do you need a fishing license to go swimming? More money into the system will not help hunters. It will only result in more restrictions, more convoluted and hard to comprehend game laws, and more officers to enforce them.
|
|
|
|
