|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
69 registered members (Big Al, hallb, hoggin, jmj120, JSOG47, headshot, 7PTSPREAD, Dixiepatriot, jdstephen44, BC, Chancetribe, BPI, AU coonhunter, trlrdrdave, Bmyers142, JAT, BayedUp, shootnmiss, stl32, Jtide, joeml18, ECO25, 7mmMag, goodman_hunter, Whitebone, RidgeRanger, Bake, 3Gs, SouthBamaSlayer, Canterberry, bamafarmer, Mully, RareBreed, Mbrock, Whiskey9, twaldrop4, Fatalis1, Showout, Slider, tmhrmh1, Okatuppa, Keysbowman, IMISSALDEER, Big AL 76, BamaBoHunter, StateLine, CNC, Maggie123, WEMOhunter, bamamed1, square, Cahabariverrat, Skillet, sj22, FPPop, dave260rem!, Crawfish, FISHER7878, Happysappy, Mack1, GomerPyle, walt4dun, 7 invisible),
652
guests, and 0
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: 1952 M70 257 rob/mag?
[Re: MallardMan84]
#3564998
12/28/21 10:11 AM
12/28/21 10:11 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 20,537 North AL
AU338MAG
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 20,537
North AL
|
If its a 257 Weatherby it's not the original barrel. No such thing as a 257 Win Mag. It's either an original 257 Roberts or a rifle that has been modified for a 257 Weatherby.
If it says 257 Roberts and 257 Weatherby on the barrel, I would not buy it. That would likely mean that someone rechambered a 257 Roberts barrel to 257 Weatherby. This would require modifications to the bolt face and receiver which destroys the value of a pre 64 M70.
Dying ain't much of a living boy...Josey Wales
Molon Labe
|
|
|
Re: 1952 M70 257 rob/mag?
[Re: MallardMan84]
#3565003
12/28/21 10:22 AM
12/28/21 10:22 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,868 B'ham
Goatkiller
14 point
|
14 point
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 9,868
B'ham
|
.257 Roberts was one of the original chamberings. Yea, you need to determine if the gun is original. If not it's not worthless as a shooter... If all original and in good condition it would be a collector.
No government employees were harmed in the making of this mess.
|
|
|
Re: 1952 M70 257 rob/mag?
[Re: Fuzzy_Bunny]
#3565488
12/28/21 07:59 PM
12/28/21 07:59 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 20,537 North AL
AU338MAG
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 20,537
North AL
|
You sure it’s not a 264 win mag? 264 Winchester magnum was introduced in 1957 or 1958. If it's really a 1952 M70 it predates that cartridge by a few years.
Dying ain't much of a living boy...Josey Wales
Molon Labe
|
|
|
Re: 1952 M70 257 rob/mag?
[Re: AU338MAG]
#3565814
12/28/21 11:29 PM
12/28/21 11:29 PM
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 12,481 Pike County, AL
Fuzzy_Bunny
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 12,481
Pike County, AL
|
You sure it’s not a 264 win mag? 264 Winchester magnum was introduced in 1957 or 1958. If it's really a 1952 M70 it predates that cartridge by a few years. Since the op couldn’t remember the chambering, I didn’t really put much stock in the gun being a 1952 model and 264 win mag just seemed to fit better.
|
|
|
Re: 1952 M70 257 rob/mag?
[Re: MallardMan84]
#3565838
12/29/21 12:22 AM
12/29/21 12:22 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,614 behind my Dillon
dave260rem!
Pope of Aldeer and Expert
|
Pope of Aldeer and Expert
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,614
behind my Dillon
|
Matt not to pick on you but let's all cuss whomever rechambered a Bob to Weatherby.
Skinny is my EX.Alcohol was involved.
|
|
|
Re: 1952 M70 257 rob/mag?
[Re: Fuzzy_Bunny]
#3565847
12/29/21 12:30 AM
12/29/21 12:30 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 20,537 North AL
AU338MAG
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 20,537
North AL
|
You sure it’s not a 264 win mag? 264 Winchester magnum was introduced in 1957 or 1958. If it's really a 1952 M70 it predates that cartridge by a few years. Since the op couldn’t remember the chambering, I didn’t really put much stock in the gun being a 1952 model and 264 win mag just seemed to fit better. It's more likely a 92 M70 than a 52 😁
Dying ain't much of a living boy...Josey Wales
Molon Labe
|
|
|
Re: 1952 M70 257 rob/mag? PICS ADDED
[Re: MallardMan84]
#3566119
12/29/21 11:55 AM
12/29/21 11:55 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 357
MallardMan84
OP
4 point
|
OP
4 point
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 357
|
|
|
|
Re: 1952 M70 257 rob/mag? PICS ADDED
[Re: MallardMan84]
#3566130
12/29/21 12:09 PM
12/29/21 12:09 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 512 ATHENS
Turkeyneck78
4 point
|
4 point
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 512
ATHENS
|
That's a shame, Pre-64 Model 70's in 257 Roberts are hard to find and someone ruined it by rechambering to 257 Mag. It's not worth $1299, maybe half that. I'd leave it since I doubt you'd be able to shoot it first before you buy.
Last edited by Turkeyneck78; 12/29/21 12:11 PM.
|
|
|
Re: 1952 M70 257 rob/mag? PICS ADDED
[Re: MallardMan84]
#3566157
12/29/21 12:40 PM
12/29/21 12:40 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 20,537 North AL
AU338MAG
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 20,537
North AL
|
It's not worth half the price they're asking for it. To modify a 257 Bob to 257 Roy, the bolt face would have too be milled for a larger case head or the bolt was swapped with a magnum bolt, which means the serial numbers don't match. Either if these will devalue the gun. Also may have feeding issues unless a gunsmith modified the feed rails and follower, which also devalues the gun. I wouldn't give $400 for that gun.
Dying ain't much of a living boy...Josey Wales
Molon Labe
|
|
|
Re: 1952 M70 257 rob/mag? PICS ADDED
[Re: MallardMan84]
#3566559
12/29/21 07:18 PM
12/29/21 07:18 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,587 Demop
1bamashooter
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,587
Demop
|
Not only is that dumb as shit its dangerous to leave 2 different chamberings listed on the barrel. I'd like to take a rubber hose to both the owner and the Smith that did that
Keep your booger hooker off the bang switch.
|
|
|
Re: 1952 M70 257 rob/mag? PICS ADDED
[Re: MallardMan84]
#3569070
12/31/21 10:30 PM
12/31/21 10:30 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 357
MallardMan84
OP
4 point
|
OP
4 point
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 357
|
|
|
|
|