Originally Posted By: 49er
Originally Posted By: sgtred
Mr 49er, the only way you can stop new conservation rules from being implemented and enforced, is to remove commissioner,advisory board etc, which SB175 does not do. They will still exist and still retain their rulemaking authority,as unconstitutional as you you think it is, DCNR will still promulgate rules and they will still be enforced. You touched on a concern a few posts back. A whole new critter will be created. Your meeting with the committee will go much further in stopping rules than SB175


I still don't understand how removing the enforcement people from the DCNR will make things worse. They've had a lot of influence on getting some of the worst rules we now have in place passed.

You are asking us to educate ourselves. Well, I have done that. I understand that the commissioner will still have rule making authority that is limited to only those rules that are necessary for conservation purposes.

For example: Do you think the rules restricting possession of firearms on OUR publicly owned lands came from the wildlife division or were they recommended by the enforcement division?
Mr 49er, I respect any man who questions his Govt. Founding fathers wanted the citizens to do that, and punish them at the ballot box. Im not trying to pooh pooh anything you have said and say this with as much respect as I can but your last statement about recommendations tells me how badly you have interpreted how things go and who is for what when it comes to rules. The enforcement section has absolutely no input about anything on WMAS. WMAS are strictly wildlife sections baby.