sftred,
... I have heard no arguments for how this will make things better for hunters, the wildlife resources, Outdoor Alabama in general
You're not paying attention if you haven't heard it.
...Seems to me, Jawbone is referring to case law. Mr 49er has posted state law as a rebuttal. Which is how the argument probably went during the case that established open field doctrine.
OK. Here's you some case law:
... The circuit courts of Alabama, as courts of general jurisdiction, have the same power and duty to provide relief for violations of federal law as do the federal courts. Indeed, when the rights provided by a state constitution mirror rights of the United States Constitution, the state court system may be a more appropriate forum for protecting those rights, because, in many instances, the individual rights provisions under the state constitution are as broad as, if not broader than, those in the federal Bill of Rights.
"While the Federal Constitution, as interpreted by the United States Supreme Court, establishes minimum standards, the states have the power and are free to provide greater safeguards and to extend this protection through their own organic law—the State Constitutions. Indeed, the 9th and 10th Amendments to the United States Constitution envisage this fundamental truth."
Gilbreath v. Wallace, 292 Ala. 267, 271, 292 So.2d 651, 654-55 (1974) (footnote omitted).
Brooks v. Hobbie, 631 So. 2d 883 - Ala: Supreme Court 1993http://www.aldeer.com/forum/ubbthreads.p...p;what=showflat ... also this from a US Supreme Court Jusice:
... "State courts cannot rest when they have afforded their citizens the full protections of the federal Constitution. State constitutions, too, are a font of individual liberties, their protections often extending beyond those required by the Supreme Court's interpretation of federal law . . . Federal law . . . must not be allowed to inhibit the independent protective force of state law—for without it, the full realization of our liberties cannot be guaranteed."
William J. Brennan,
State Constitutions and the Protection of Individual Rights,90 Harv. L. Rev. 489, 491 (1977)