Here's what I said about the biologists working as game wardens:
49er,
Quote:
... As for the enforcement part: Shouldn't state biologists be scientists instead of cops? Why should we pay to hire qualified biologists and then expect them to be game wardens most of their time to enforce silly rules that have little or anything to do with true conservation??
I posted the job announcement from the state personnel dept's website for you to read. It clearly combines enforcement officer duties with wildlife biologist.
If you're too dense to get my point, then there's no need wasting my time with you.
