|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 members (RareBreed, BAR1225, Pocosin, UncleHuck, sw1002, leroyb, James, fish251, BearBranch, burbank, dave260rem!, TamaDrumhead, 1hunter, CNC, paintrock, odocoileus, remlap, RSF, donia, Joe4majors, TexasHuntress, 3bailey3, Luvbowhuntn, Josh Crocker, AUdeer88, Fullthrottle, Tigger85, Captain Howdy, bamapanic, M48scout, roosterbob, woodduck, slipperyrock, BrandonClark, Dog, therealhojo, Morris, AU7MM08, HIPCEO, doublefistful, ucmducks, 4Tigers, Stacey, Bamarich2, Butchman205, JohnG, Longtine, Claims Rep., Beadlescomb, BAR II .270, 5 invisible),
858
guests, and
0
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,377
14 point
|
|
14 point
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,377 |
One important issue clubs that have such rules about restricting the shooting of does off food plots.... If that's your rule, and you have hogs, you'd better include no shooting of "hogs" either as there's not much difference in shooting hogs and shooting does off food plots. They both amount to human scent and negative activity! Our club had a no shooting of does off food plots but didn't say anything about hogs, which to me, there's no difference!
I mostly agree with your statement with the exception that the only reason to still shoot hogs is that they need to be elimated at all costs or they will eventually ruin your hunting and destroy habitat resources where as does do not have that effect.
|
|
|
|
|
