Originally Posted by Nightwatchman
I mean yeah, I agree. It doesnt really matter if she was in a state of psychosis or whatever, that doesnt clear you from strangling your innocent children.

If this doesn't constitute the death penalty, I am not sure what will.


While I agree with your assessment there’s always another side and how things got there.


Everyone projects “their” biases into all equations. It’s a rare day if folks stop to think from a differing perspective
Just cause “you” see or think a certain way doesn’t mean others agree with you. Matter of fact there’s the likelihood many have totally different perspectives

I’ve not followed it and haven’t heard anything from my wife and her opinion.
However in FB I’ve seen several day by day plays of what’s happening in court, actual therapist that deal with mental health patients and have for some time. Clancy according to them she is a very troubling case and it seems she was substantially mix medicated.

I’m curious as to how many warning signs were missed and where red flag laws are troubling for both sides of an issue. Just saw where she mentioned to a psych she was divorced from reality

Overall the trial shows how complex the mental health field is. You’ll never bat 100%

I’ll add that another issue is we as a society have half of society that’ll coddle bad behaviors that lead down a more destructive road

That doesn’t help

“Socialism only works in two places: Heaven where they don't need it and hell where they already have it.” ― Ronald Reagan