Originally Posted by Backwards cowboy
Originally Posted by Fattyfireplug
I watched a video of a Florida cop saying he had irrefutable proof a woman was stealing packages. Said you couldn't sneeze without being on camera. He was adamant and a complete arrogant shit head.

Presumed guilty. She fought back. Found her own video proof she wasn't the thief and beat the charges before court. The misuse overrides any good that may come from it. I lean toward making it harder for proving anything.

Cops should have to ask for video from citizens.

Also saw a police department put up flock cameras without the city council knowing. I'm interested to see how that plays out. I am in no way a fan of a surveillance state. The patriot act showed us all how the system will be misused. But we never learn.



Sheriff's dept can apply for a grant to feds, for them. The feds pay for them, and have a fee for them that has to be paid by municipality. If city council, decides to cut Sheriff's budget so their not paid for, they become property of the federal government, and no one can take them down. Also was told , and i dont know if its true or not. I dont really believe. But someone told me there were zero flock cameras before trump.

Flock started as a company during Trump's first term.
Axon, which is bigger and less known, started as TASER in the 90's then went into video surveillance and body cams during Bush's last term and Obama's first term.
They are both NSA connected and are for the sole purpose of domestic surveillance, controlling our population, and stopping uprisings against the government.

"Never Trust Government" -- Smart people.
"The Great thing we should Fear and the Weird Thing we Trust is Elon Musk" -- Me
"You can be broke but you cant be poor." -- Ruthie-May Webster