|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134 members (quailman, 3bailey3, rhino21, RidgeRanger, Longtine, juice, Bread, CrappieMan, JA, JCL, AU7MM08, Backwards cowboy, bayouturkey, NoHuntin, Floorman1, Bruno, Robert D., Aldecks1, dave260rem!, Pwyse, smithgrow, woodduck, AC870, outdoorguy88, Huntn2feed5, Narrow Gap, GATA87, Solothurn, Fatalis, Stoney, handihunter, Jweeks, Bowfish, furnfeather, Gunpowder, farmerjay, WhoMe, icducks, BrentsFX4, mathews prostaff, cartervj, gatorbait154, jmj120, GomerPyle, mcninja, T Bone, Bandit635, JAT, Koba, cch, rutwad, fladeerhntr, wareagle22, bamafarmer, Captain Howdy, sawdust, billrv, centralala, tombo51, NorthFork, CNC, !shiloh!, cullbuck, DoeNut, dtmwtp, Big AL 76, Wes7777, NotsoBright, Fishbones, bamaeyedoc, claybird, YellaLineHunter, Cjunkin, C3SEAST, Birdman83, Cynical, deadeye48, sj22, Remington270, JHL, 10 POINT, stuball, LDTiger, 7short, CAL, Raincrow, BobK, ALDawg, Skinner, Dean, Mack1, bows_and_does, Geeb, Marengo hunter, weatherby, PYhunter, staticflownut, Turkeyneck78, inatree, Sasquatch Lives, WGDfarm23, auman, k bush, Yellerhammer, jacannon, 3blades, ferbama, BentBarrel, Fattyfireplug, SC53, booner, gog1015, Ben2, geeb1, paulfish4570, deerman24, BOFF, mjs14, dagwood, Dr595, Josh Crocker, desertdog, jjust, Showout, 10 invisible),
708
guests, and
0
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 28,010 Likes: 88
Freak of Nature
|
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 28,010 Likes: 88 |
Can a state deem suppressors legal for hunting?
Or maybe legal on single shot or bolt action rifles?
Is there a fed law against it?
Can the state over-ride that law by focusing on "used for hunting" language?
|
|
|
|
|
