Aldeer.com Forums Alabama Deer Talk Aldeer General Forum Charlie Kirk Trial

I think she is another person that is letting the sins of the nation of Israel override what is supposed to be support for the Jewish race.

Candace is making bank on Charlie’s death

Someone posted her numbers after attacking his widow and the numbers have skyrocket.
Basically she’s monetized his death. She claimed to be his friend. That’s some friend.

Serious question Jawbone, do you think we can support the Jewish race without supporting the modern political nation known as Israel?

It should be understood that this is not a trial. It is a preliminary hearing. We have the same thing in Alabama. They take anywhere from 10 minutes to possibly a couple hours if it is a murder case. The sole purpose of a preliminary is for the judge to see whether probable cause exists for the case to go to the grand jury.

The prosecution does not have to score a touchdown. They just have to make a first down, if that. Generally speaking, the rules of evidence don't apply in a preliminary hearing.

It should also be know that the Defendant can waive his right to a preliminary hearing and the state can't do a thing about it. That happens a lot.

It doesn't matter that the judge is erring on the side of caution in sustaining the defense's objections to certain evidence. As mentioned above, the standard of proof for a preliminary hearing is very low. The standard of proof at a jury trial is beyond a reasonable doubt, the highest standard in our country.

He has made his decision already and this case will be set for trial.

I've always questioned Candance's sincerity as a conservative. She blew up out of nowhere, just as soon as Trump made the scene in 2016. Prior to that, she was a full blown liberal democrat that ran a hard left-leaning blog that trashed conservatives and republicans daily, but then overnight, she flipped 180 degrees. I've always felt that she was a democrat influencer plant. That or she simply saw how much air time she could control, and how much money and fame she could have if she played the role of a young, black, female, conservative, MAGA, and she jumped right on the wagon .

They must be withholding all the evidence that definitively puts him shooting Charlie for the trial. Maybe the “mountain of evidence” they promised us will come out in the actual trial. There’s too many holes in what they have introduced, so far.

Yes, just as we as Americans can love and support our gov't and fellow Americans even though we are not always happy with them. Jews and Israel usually go hand in hand, but not always. When separating the two, it usually takes being specific as to why they are not entwined. I hope that makes sense.

The text are pretty damning and many are different than reported initially.
Imagine that

I wished I had a dollar for every deer hunting ballistics expert I saw on FB stating his head should’ve been blown off with that powerful 30-06 bullet. Freaking idots. You’re spot on but you just killed the main part of the conspiracy

I’d be rich

The bullet did not match the battle of the rifle found.

True!

However and it’s a biggy!!!!

The bullet was in numerous pieces and unable to match ANY barrel.
The Whole Truth!!!!!!

So much more and kills the narrative of the conspiracies

Correct. "The bullet is too mangled to positively match it to Tyler's rifle" doesn't mean "the bullet was not fired from Tyler's rifle".

Those can be manipulated. Kinda like getting a call from a spoofed number. Things aren’t always as they seem. There’s been way more head scratching things that happened after the murder to really trust what’s going on. The trial will be interesting, to say the least.

Keep them conspiracies rolling lol

His lover, in court confirmed Tyler confessed to him

He either killed Charlie or he did not pull the trigger but he is still in on the murder with accomplices.

The result is that Charlie Kirk and TPUSA and his good work are dead and being denigrated by the very people who were living off of his efforts. Erika Kirk could give Tammy Faye Baker a run for her money.

It absolutely does, thanks.

Supposedly, the bullet itself was sub caliber for the weapon itself and held in a sabot, exactly like a lot of us shoot in our muzzleloaders....... It's called the 30-06 Remington Accelerator. The bullet in that load is actually a 55gr .224 (normal for use in .223/5.56) and was produced by Remington (may still be). It's a setup for varmint shooting at velocities way above standard 30-06 ammo at 4000 to 4500 FPS. That could account for destruction of the bullet upon impact with whatever it hit. I'm not speculation one way or the other but waiting for the case to play out in court.

If that's the case, the bullet that killed Charlie was a one-off. They just showed pics of the other cartridges that were in the rifle, and while they were Remingtons according to their head stamps, they appeared to be normal ole coreloks.

Supposedly, the bullet itself was sub caliber for the weapon itself and held in a sabot, exactly like a lot of us shoot in our muzzleloaders....... It's called the 30-06 Remington Accelerator. The bullet in that load is actually a 55gr .224 (normal for use in .223/5.56) and was produced by Remington (may still be). It's a setup for varmint shooting at velocities way above standard 30-06 ammo at 4000 to 4500 FPS. That could account for destruction of the bullet upon impact with whatever it hit. I'm not speculation one way or the other but waiting for the case to play out in court.

[/quote]

Where did you see/find that information?

I'm searching for it. found some threads from April referring to it but haven't found THE post that I'm looking for.

There were some reports early on that was the type bullet. I remember when they hit the market



I saw what was supposed to be evidence photo that showed something else. Not sure I’ve ever seen a corelokt to be honest. I reload and shot my own stuff and wouldn’t buy corelokts for reloading
Not that there’s anything wrong with them but I’ll go more premium if I’m going to the trouble.