|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114 members (DGAMBLER, Raspy, Mbrock, kyles, Narrow Gap, Whiskey9, Big AL 76, Ant67, akbejeepin, Jdkprp70, rhino21, fi8shmasty, Tupi, Geeb, slick_trick, cartervj, 7PTSPREAD, BrentsFX4, Mennen34, Swamp Monkey, Camden86, Turkeyneck78, woodduck, IMISSALDEER, Bustinbeards, Dubie, aucountry, 3bailey3, jacannon, Beadlescomb, NoHuntin, mopar, slippinlipjr, gobblebox, CNC, Oscarflytyer, BamaGuitarDude, 7short, quailman, Cactus_buck, AU coonhunter, specialk, Okatuppa, Snuffy, Dr595, roll_tide_hunts, Gobble4me757, coldtrail, Fattyfireplug, Chaser357, slipperyrock, El_Matador, brett.smith, JHL, Beer Belly, Floorman1, AU338MAG, Backwards cowboy, Standbanger, 7x57_Mauser, Sgiles, !shiloh!, AJones, SC53, ts1979flh, hayman, Overland, dtmwtp, Waygin76, Bulls eye, MountainTopHunter, top cat, WhoMe, JohnG, m97, TexasHuntress, rwh1, Six shooter, Holcomb, rutwad, dave260rem!, jmj120, sanderson, jaredhunts, RocN151, Sixpointholler, MS_Hunter, RidgeRanger, BigA47, thayerp81, rst87, CouchNapper, Mack1, Catbird, jawbone, canvasback, 25-20, 17 invisible),
698
guests, and
0
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2025
Posts: 270 Likes: 8
4 point
|
|
4 point
Joined: May 2025
Posts: 270 Likes: 8 |
What do you mean what if they don’t accept their marriage license? That’s one of the documents clearly listed that a married woman would need to bring along with her BC and ID, unless she already had a passport or the other qualifying docs.
It’s more than ridiculous to think a married woman would need to get her BC altered to match her ID because it isn’t even possible. Again, a person’s BC documents who they were when they were born.
What you really meant to infer was that it’s just too hard and too costly to provide these documents, therefore they shouldn’t be required to prove who you are before you vote. You’ve been brainwashed to believe that, but it really isn’t true. It’s literally a poll tax. If your documents are lost in a move, a fire, in a safe taken in a theft, dog ate them, whatever, and you replacing them is a barrier to them to vote, it’s a poll tax. We pay ungodly amounts of taxes to the government already, so our identifying documents should be FREE and as least hassle as possible if they are needed to vote. But that’s what a lot of politicians want right? Voter suppression. The broke single mother/widow who might vote democrat doesn’t have a spare $50-75 to fix her documents so she lets the election slide by rather than go to the poll. Or some fresh 18 year old who has no idea how all this works can’t get his birth certificate because his controlling helicopter parents won’t give it to him (maybe because they think he won’t vote the way they will) and he doesn’t know he can go to the health department to print a new one and just gives up? I’m literally just going by the constitution and a very long standing Supreme Court case.
|
|
|
|
|