New SOAs?
by CatHeadBiscuit - 09/01/26 02:02 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
165 members (zwick, cch, mw2015, NWALJM, kyles, MAG, Chiller, buzzard, Garndawg, Jweeks, abolt300, BCD, dagwood, Dilbert, rutwad, slippinlipjr, 3bailey3, trlrdrdave, TideWJO, deerman24, sethjamtoe, CouchNapper, AU7MM08, Skullworks, specialk, Hunting-231, big mike, James, Ridgehunter36, DGAMBLER, Raven, 3Gs, RSF, Remington270, k bush, Gunpowder, scrape, Longtine, oldforester, South Ala Hunter, 270wsm, Bruno, GomerPyle, MarksOutdoors, sawdust, abolthunter, Mbrock, Turkeytrott82, ronfromramer, Jdkprp70, cmontgomery, walt4dun, TheVern, DuckDown11, Skillet, 7PTSPREAD, BREEZE1, Mavtal, Raspy, jacannon, beerhunter, Six shooter, NVM1031, foldemup, HURRICANE, rrice0725, Backwards cowboy, IMISSALDEER, DEDTRKY, Dean, bwbrookie, Ruger7mag, Lil_Fella, ferbama, BD, CAL, RidgeRanger, slim68, PikeRoadHunter, sj22, mdavis, PanolaProductions, Bamarich2, Nightwatchman, 10 POINT, jawbone, ts1979flh, CeeHawk37, QuackSmacker14, BearBranch, Driveby, benchmade47, therealhojo, !shiloh!, canichols424, rst87, ParrotHead89, SwampHunter, biglmbass, Turkeyneck78, Exhoosier, booner, Jmfire722, Macon176, somedude, Robert D., woodduck, PineTop, JDW25, Kelly_123, BrentsFX4, AUjerbear, Sixpointholler, JohnG, UA Hunter, wareagle22, JA, aucountry, Fatalis, hunter84, Young20, bamacamp, laylandad, JD53, akbejeepin, znix123, WEMOhunter, staticflownut, Overland, BCharles, Big AL 76, HDS64, CNC, jmj120, Floorman1, RocN151, gradythemachine, inatree, ozarktroutbum, Cousneddy, MCbama, Gobble4me757, 3blades, mopar, blade, Four_Horse, Luxfisher, wk2hnt, sw1002, 16 invisible),
771
guests, and
0
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,112 Likes: 15
10 point
|
|
10 point
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,112 Likes: 15 |
What do you mean what if they don’t accept their marriage license? That’s one of the documents clearly listed that a married woman would need to bring along with her BC and ID, unless she already had a passport or the other qualifying docs.
It’s more than ridiculous to think a married woman would need to get her BC altered to match her ID because it isn’t even possible. Again, a person’s BC documents who they were when they were born.
What you really meant to infer was that it’s just too hard and too costly to provide these documents, therefore they shouldn’t be required to prove who you are before you vote. You’ve been brainwashed to believe that, but it really isn’t true.
Last edited by CD; 06/05/26 12:47 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
