|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 members (Chiller, Kennnn, Gunpowder, k bush, CatfishJunkie, DoubleShoalsJR, BamaPlowboy, Parker243, RCHRR, Kang, shootnmiss, kyles, TideWJO, Bustinbeards, Borty, Bruno, SC53, Koba, Chaser357, rrice0725, fillmore, tightwads, abolt300, CAL, 000buck, Flyliner, CAM, gobblebox, Paint Rock 00, Dragfan66, 3Gs, Six shooter, Geeb, VERACITY, JohnG, demop_native, mjs14, Moss, Young20, AU7MM08, RocN151, Exhoosier, mossyback, Bglen, jaredhunts, COOTER, Teacher One, 10 invisible),
760
guests, and
0
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,282 Likes: 15
10 point
|
|
10 point
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,282 Likes: 15 |
Well, if it’s a ‘early’ gun with typical issues and a 2-9/16” chamber, that’s just in the average deal realm, give or take. I’ll apologize for that….thought I had deleted it. Wasn’t trying to slight the gun, and decided it likely sounded that way. Turns out, it’s not an early gun or 2-9/16, anyway. For a post WWII/pre 53.5 standard weight in decent shape, it actually was a good deal. Those can be converted to speedload, if desired. If the year came from Browning’s info, I’d still say it could be a 47-50 gun. Shirley’s records are more reliable/exact than Browning Utah. Those actually make the better dove gun vs a Sweet… the extra weight helps there. 
Last edited by ALMODUX; 05/09/26 09:31 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
