Originally Posted by abolt300
Originally Posted by 2Dogs
Tags tied to property size / landowners .........NOT GONNA HAPPEN. That's for states with limited animals and high hunter numbers , especially non-residents , wanting to hunt them. Think Elk. Once again , solutions for problems that don't exist .
Dang 2Dogs, you just perfectly described what CNC has been preaching. We don’t have near enough deer, and what we do have is being killed off quickly. Way too many hunters and the number is increasing every yr. Way way too many OOS deer slaughtering marauders. It’s probably the perfect time to institute a landowner tag system. Especially since all the charts and graphs are showing it’s happening statewide and even in the non-fragmented areas. I know you’re a prudent man and care about the wildlife. Are you implying that you don’t believe what CNC’s been preaching?

Always been pretty good at not falling prey to slick talkin' preachers.

On a serious note on this subject , hunters who don't own land or have family or really good friend who does , probably couldn't afford a landowner tag on a primo place. Maybe a second job or tap the kids college fund would get them across the finish line. Hunting is already expensive and those who cry about that the most want to send the price in the stratosphere. Public land would get mighty crowded , if you get drawn .

Last edited by 2Dogs; 01/03/26 09:30 AM.

"Why do you ask"?

Too many people spend money they don't have , on things they don't need, to impress people they don't know.