Originally Posted by T-hatchie
twaldrop, I always find sense in your posts, I just believe that we don’t have to invite “increased” government to fix existing bad government. I’m referring to replacing some bad wildlife regulations with better regulations.


Thanks. I really try to see both sides of an argument. I’ve learned that most of the time there’s logic and reason that causes the person to formulate opinions. I believe that to a point cnc is dead on what he says and see in his region. I feel that he projects what he lives on the state as a whole though and then refuses to hear anything differently I know a lot of people that hunt. Of the ones that I know literally 100s most won’t hardly shoot a doe period much less 2 a day. Of the people that I know personally that hunt I bet less than 20 does total get killed. I do feel there are people that globe alluded to and cnc alludes to that absolutely take advantage of liberal bag limits, but you’d have to provide me some hard factual evidence (like hunting club kill sheets with names assigned) to prove to me that it’s an widespread problem. Game check is entirely inaccurate for the most part. It’s to easily manipulated and I know folks, especially older, that just aren’t going to use it so those numbers are a waste in my opinion. Most people would hate my regulations if I was in charge so it’s a good thing I’m not lol