|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
151 members (bamapanic, foldemup, Cannon Kid, Sself161, abolt300, juice, StateLine, ts1979flh, rrice0725, Gunpowder, Ben2, 007, doublefistful, AU7MM08, coldtrail, Ol’Tom, GrandSlam, Chiller, GomerPyle, 7PTSPREAD, Fullthrottle, outdoorguy88, quailman, jdstephen44, Shmoe, Cjunkin, skymech, Ridgehunter36, Aldecks1, Big60, BACK40, HHSyelper, bamacamp, joeml18, Ruger8point, Lil_Fella, Fishduck, hippi, Driveby, 7short, Cahabariverrat, WPZJR, Beer Belly, 10 POINT, El_Matador, catdoctor, sj22, odocoileus, slippinlipjr, geeb1, DonH, Yellahammer, Longtine, Spotchaser8, Showout, 1hunter, BPI, hunter84, Hunting-231, PineTop, CrappieMan, BrentsFX4, JD53, NVM1031, Okatuppa, Tall Dog, Bread, Downwind, icducks, capehorn24, AU_Digger, HDS64, 3006bullet, chill, bn163, booner, courseup, Solothurn, jellyhead, Paint Rock 00, leroycnbucks, Jwbfx4, ShaftOne, dave260rem!, gman, WEMOhunter, desertdog, bug54, furnfeather, Gobble4me757, zwick, jmj120, fur_n_feathers, mdavis, rkt, Overland, IMISSALDEER, mzzy, aucountry, Turkeyneck78, jawbone, cartervj, Luxfisher, hunterturf, CatfishJunkie, BAR II .270, Canterberry, jprice, PossumPecker, jhardy, beeline08, trlrdrdave, Hunt4Jesus, GKM, Tree Hanger, deerhunter_1, deadeye48, Bonecollector58, cmontgomery, Brian_C, Flyliner, AU coonhunter, brett.smith, AUjerbear, Woodsy, Raspy, centralala, twaldrop4, donia, Turkey_neck, Lead Poison, mossyback, CRUTCHJD76, salock, oldandwise, jarcher38, Treelimb, kyles, 13 invisible),
1,205
guests, and
0
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 46,095 Likes: 240
Freak of Nature
|
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 46,095 Likes: 240 |
It's baffling that the same person espousing the importance of the First Amendment also apparently thinks a business owner shouldn't be allowed to decide who he employs or doesn't employ, and a business owner firing someone for saying/doing something that could be detrimental to his business is not "oppression". It's less baffling, though, when one considers that said person clearly has no idea what the First Amendment actually protects and doesn't protect. The 'Ignore' feature is a wonderful thing  
|
|
|
|
|
