Here’s a theory……Lets say we take one of these counties like Montgomery now for example where doe harvest numbers have trended upwards from 1400 to 2200 does killed and populations have trended downwards because of it……

In order for populations to get back to where we want them then it would seem that we need to bring down the doe harvest…….Does it matter now who “doesn’t shoot does” in Montgomery Co to make up the 800 doe difference?......Couldnt we just hypothetically call up enough big landowners and clubs and have them NOT shoot any doe quotas?? Seems like this would be a pretty easy thing to do with a DMAP system……Does every property really have to be managed site specifically for does or could it be managed for the county by one big collective group shooting or better yet NOT shooting females depending on what was needed??

Last edited by CNC; 02/11/25 09:20 PM.

Folks that know don't shoot old does........ wink