|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114 members (cgardner, JA, LostinTX, Floorman1, Marengo hunter, centralala, Bustinbeards, cch, 3006bullet, HHSyelper, Stewart36567, MS_Hunter, lthrstkg1, Geeb, Gut Pile 32, jprice, Mountain Boho, furnfeather, jdstephen44, chill, Young20, rrice0725, AU7MM08, CNC, 300gr, fish_blackbass, Sgiles, Longtine, GMCScott, demop_native, RockFarmer, woodduck, James, WarEagle300, Ron A., Ruger8point, lefthorn, chuck216, Narrow Gap, 7x57_Mauser, CouchNapper, Okatuppa, dtmwtp, Koba, El_Matador, Beadlescomb, jaredhunts, geeb1, quailman, Austin1, Tree Hanger, MTeague, mcninja, claybird, BradB, CatfishJunkie, dustymac, coldtrail, Parker243, Richard Cranium, abolt300, Showout, Nowlide, fur_n_feathers, 3blades, CAM, Overland, BGR, Jweeks, MIB, DoubleShoalsJR, ImThere, Bowfish, jmj120, Antelope08, DGAMBLER, donia, rutwad, Rainbowstew, Catfish28, beerhunter, Bigwhitey, Honcho, fishunt1001, green river 123, ts1979flh, outdoorguy88, weatherby, Ant67, Morris, AJones, Etyson, cullbuck, fillmore, jsubrett6, Chiller, Mack1, Double Creek2, brett.smith, Fishduck, 14 invisible),
756
guests, and
0
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 10,975 Likes: 190
Fancy
|
|
Fancy
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 10,975 Likes: 190 |
So how many properties do you manage that have required killing more bucks than does to correct the balance?
Yes, it’s absolutely about killing does as well as managing habitat. There’s a difference between an educated decision to kill a certain number of does and “blasting the bleep out of does” So what is lost when you kill a doe that needs to be killed? Uh, I don’t know, maybe deer? For every doe you kill, you kill every fawn she will ever have. Some of those fawns are bucks. I guess I’m just saying it’s a fine balance in my mind. And typically, unless you have 1000s of acres or a high fence it will never be close to an exact science. It’s not an exact science, and it’s precisely why I tell most of my clients to get the numbers where we would like to get them in relation to habitat, and at that point we will modify harvest annually. It’s a fluid target. Very few properties can withstand heavy doe harvest indefinitely. BUT, it is a tool. It’s like driving 80 mph on the interstate. That’s fine until you hit a back road. When conditions change you have to adjust your speed.
|
|
|
|
|