|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 members (BearBranch, Cactus_buck, pickenstj, DThrash, akbejeepin, bambam32, Albowhntr2, GomerPyle, gwstang, Geeb, Jus_me, CNC, Okatuppa, Bglen, XVIII, Goose, skymech, Dublgrumpy, aucountry, odocoileus, Ray_Coon, AU338MAG, Cuz-Pat, 4Him146, James, Gobble4me757, mossyback, CouchNapper, square, walt4dun, Bruno, sawdust, AU7MM08, Holcomb, 3bailey3, DoubleNickel, 7PTSPREAD, jhardy, woodduck, M48scout, MAG, benchmade47, CatfishJunkie, robinhedd, Sus scrofa Reduction Specialist, 1hunter, Cynical, 4Tigers, fourfive45, BrandonClark, Pwyse, RCHRR, ECO25, LongBeards29, kodiak06, C3SEAST, hillmp, cch, TEM, AlabamaPhi, Engine5, Tree Hanger, icducks, QuackSmacker14, jaredhunts, cartervj, dave260rem!, Longtine, MikeP, Wildboar14, skoor, seminole1, johndeere5036, 2 ducks, AU coonhunter, cullbuck, Aldecks1, headshot, Big Al, twaldrop4, jtillery, brett.smith, smithjearl, ImThere, BAR1225, k bush, LostinTX, Big AL 76, Booner Hunter, TamaDrumhead, leroycnbucks, Sgiles, Tupi, RidgeRanger, mathews prostaff, T-Rock, leroyb, demop_native, 007, burbank, Joe4majors, mzzy, Bustinbeards, Ruger7mag, Dubie, 7short, Atoler, klay, JoeyWommack, JBrown1975, GRINNING, abolt300, Canterberry, Jason Carroll, Birdman83, Raincrow, Kelly_123, Jay512, Showout, 11 invisible),
764
guests, and
0
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 617 Likes: 3
4 point
|
|
4 point
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 617 Likes: 3 |
Could any of this be challenged in courts? Supreme Court even? Could it be deemed unconstitutional? Serious question. I would think that it would have to be. I don't see how you could give someone a blanket pardon without listing what specific offenses that they are being pardoned from. Idk all of them are corrupt to one degree or the other. A lot of the Republicans will just let it slide in a tit for tat to keep their skeletons in their own closets.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 8,551 Likes: 5
14 point
|
|
14 point
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 8,551 Likes: 5 |
Could any of this be challenged in courts? Supreme Court even? Could it be deemed unconstitutional? Serious question. I would think that it would have to be. I don't see how you could give someone a blanket pardon without listing what specific offenses that they are being pardoned from. Idk all of them are corrupt to one degree or the other. A lot of the Republicans will just let it slide in a tit for tat to keep their skeletons in their own closets. That’s exactly how I was going to describe it. A blanket type of pardon, or a “just in case” type of pardon. I just don’t see how that could legally stand up.
|
|
|
|
|
