|
|
|
|
|
|
Guns
by Bmyers142 - 05/09/25 05:23 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
25 members (cullbuck, BCLC, burbank, jawbone, BobK, FLGunslinger, canine933, paintrock, Cactus_buck, Captain Howdy, Crappie, Longtine, CAL, Bronco 74, M48scout, Booner Hunter, scrape, leroyb, Jotjackson, Tigger85, akbejeepin, Morris, Moss, 2 invisible),
1,075
guests, and
0
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 495
4 point
|
|
4 point
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 495 |
Could any of this be challenged in courts? Supreme Court even? Could it be deemed unconstitutional? Serious question. I would think that it would have to be. I don't see how you could give someone a blanket pardon without listing what specific offenses that they are being pardoned from. Idk all of them are corrupt to one degree or the other. A lot of the Republicans will just let it slide in a tit for tat to keep their skeletons in their own closets.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 8,494
The 46 Year Old Bowhunting Virgin
|
|
The 46 Year Old Bowhunting Virgin
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 8,494 |
Could any of this be challenged in courts? Supreme Court even? Could it be deemed unconstitutional? Serious question. I would think that it would have to be. I don't see how you could give someone a blanket pardon without listing what specific offenses that they are being pardoned from. Idk all of them are corrupt to one degree or the other. A lot of the Republicans will just let it slide in a tit for tat to keep their skeletons in their own closets. That’s exactly how I was going to describe it. A blanket type of pardon, or a “just in case” type of pardon. I just don’t see how that could legally stand up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
