|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
73 members (LIOJeff, oakachoy, Frankie, 3Gs, ridgestalker, ts1979flh, Fishduck, hallb, Ant67, Big Game Hunter, goodman_hunter, OldgoatTN68, BigA47, Okatuppa, chill, abolt300, BrandonClark, Lvlhdd, Bmyers142, Brian_C, Dean, CNC, Red Fox, joeml18, IMISSALDEER, BC_Reb, slippinlipjr, doublefistful, Ben2, UABCPA, BAR1225, BigEd, Bronco 74, twaldrop4, hunter84, Cactus_buck, Spec, Driveby, blade, BentBarrel, BCLC, Sgiles, odocoileus, sportrep, dwaugh, 3006bullet, Squeaky, dave260rem!, aubigmac, AU67Skeeter, quailman, sawdust, Ron Brown, Mbrock, BPI, geeb1, grundan, Catbird, TwoRs, JLMiller, burbank, crenshawco, BrentsFX4, SharpSpur, HDS64, mjs14, scrape, 6 invisible),
979
guests, and
0
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,254
12 point
|
|
12 point
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,254 |
Things don’t happen “just because”……  They don't but the combination of things can be attributed to "just because. Why would a well managed "optimal" property we deal with have an excellent hatch the same year that a "sub-prime" that we deal with? One has all the components and traps, the other is timber managed and both are burned. Both have good turkeys but the optimal has consistently higher densities. Both have good hatches in the same years. One just has more due to better habitat and predator control.
I swear by my life and my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine
|
|
|
|
|
