If they can fly drones, anyone can. Good for the goose, etc

There is zero difference between a game camera and a drone, except for quibbling over it being a more useful platform than a tree: the results/purpose/capabilities of camera technology is the same….the only difference is where the camera is mounted. Imagery doesn’t care about its platform, it just takes images. IF you aren’t hunting with electronic enhancement imagery devices, then I don’t understand the problem, OR why AL has such an issue with mere possession while hunting. They’re useful in a myriad of ways for safety and game recovery. If they aren’t capable of being weapon mounted or used as a sight, they aren’t gonna enable you to kill any turkey or deer you wouldn’t be able to kill without one. Sure, you can see stuff you might not have seen before, but you still couldn’t kill it. I’ve proven that on many occasions. How many of you would like to KNOW a deer is down and dead, before leaving it overnight to ruin, or calling out a tracking dog for no reason?….or would like to be able just to walk to or from your vehicle without running off the 47 deer between your truck and your stand?….or find a dog, lost person, etc before it gets truly out of hand? You’ll have folks that abuse anything, but the rest shouldn’t forego their own safety/convenience over those types. What if you’ve got a day to put $ down on a turkey or other lease, and can’t scout it much? A drone ‘survey’ one night for roosted birds might be the difference between some big wasted $, or a good deal. Just some thoughts. If they’re the devil to you, go to your own church. They DO have legitimate purposes, and I think the state should give wardens thermals…for their own safety, if nothing else. Will a few of them abuse them? Likely. They’re just human beings like the rest of us.