Originally Posted by CNC
This is what I’m talking about Matt…..According to Backwoods Cowboy you just went to his place and told him he didn’t need to shoot does because he wasn’t anywhere near his carrying capacity ……Now I’m telling his “neighbor” literally the same thing and you’re arguing for something different. Are you sure you’re not just trying to argue with me instead of it being about the point??

You have to apply a solution that’s adapted to fit the realities in front of us instead of just using the generic formula from the text book.



I hope you know I wouldn’t argue for arguments sake. I guess the point I’m trying to make is it’s equally irresponsible for either one of us to throw blanket statements out there not knowing all the details. You have a picture of deer in a field and a guy who wants to kill a few does. You said he’s not going into improve his hunting by shooting a couple of does. I didn’t even think that was in question, yet that’s where you went with it. It’s certainly not going to harm anything. Other than saying that I wouldn’t make a harvest recommendation based off a picture alone. I made the recommendations to Backwoods Cowboy based off his objectives and the habitat condition I saw on site. If bamaeyedoc wanted a consult I’d do the same for him. Recommendations would be made considering three things, being, objectives, habitat condition and restraints or limiting factors from adjoining properties.
Im going to assume here that bamaeyedoc don’t have neighbors shooting a lot of does. Could be wrong. And I’m the last person to apply generic formulas from a textbook. I’m actually well outside that box.