S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
64 members (quailman, Holcomb, taggedout, OldgoatTN68, Pwyse, Fedex 1, CAM, chill, oakachoy, effinacotton, 4Tigers, GomerPyle, Okatuppa, BPI, pass thru, burbank, HSV. HUNTER, LIOJeff, Lvlhdd, twaldrop4, hallb, Bread, Frankie, 3Gs, ridgestalker, ts1979flh, Fishduck, Ant67, Big Game Hunter, goodman_hunter, BigA47, abolt300, BrandonClark, Bmyers142, Brian_C, Dean, CNC, Red Fox, joeml18, IMISSALDEER, BC_Reb, slippinlipjr, doublefistful, Ben2, UABCPA, BAR1225, BigEd, Bronco 74, hunter84, Cactus_buck, Spec, Driveby, blade, BentBarrel, BCLC, Sgiles, odocoileus, sportrep, dwaugh, 5 invisible),
950
guests, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 177
3 point
|
3 point
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 177 |
They certainly used to hand out more doe permits to areas with large acreage and large populations. Back when it was 5 days only. You're saying a landowner would report his land ownership while buying a license and state "I have 2,000 acres so I deserve 10 doe permits"? So two hunters living next door to each other had different numbers of doe permits based on their personal acreage? I have no doubt different areas would have different amounts of doe permits based on population dynamics.
Last edited by RandanAL; 01/19/24 04:04 PM.
|
|
|
|
|