|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
85 members (crocker, Lil_Fella, William, Daveleeal, farmerjay, smallgame, Herdbull, PineTop, 44MAG, BPI, Beer Belly, MikeP, capehorn24, 7PTSPREAD, Joe4majors, outdoorguy88, Bustinbeards, Calvin, Dubie, HBWALKER14, 7mmMag, hallb, daylate, sawdust, gman, Fullthrottle, Woody1, Kicker, odocoileus, Ryano, Stoney, Cjunkin, Fishduck, AU coonhunter, wareagle22, Cuz-Pat, Darrylcom, jwalker77, Skinner, NoHuntin, BhamFred, SC53, Turkey, Tree Dweller, Tracker, Catbird, AU338MAG, fillmore, Turkeyneck78, StateLine, Oscarflytyer, Ridgehunter36, JohnG, bamafarmer, Mack1, DGAMBLER, hue, ALMODUX, Chaser357, Mansfield, 3bailey3, healy4au, WEMOhunter, Ron A., rkt, jmj120, billrv, Dvaney32, Hoytdad10, DHW, Okatuppa, somedude, walt4dun, rutwad, Ruger7mag, donia, 9 invisible),
988
guests, and
0
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 7,017
14 point
|
|
14 point
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 7,017 |
Wheat would only benefit the farmer if he already had the equipment needed to combine the wheat. Also it comes off later and negates planting in corn. Wheat is usually followed by soybeans. What I would do is take the outer rows against the woods, say 10-12 feet and plant it in clovers, winter wheat or whatever. Usually that is the least fertile land due to trees sucking the nutrients out of the dirt anyway. It's a win win as your crops are out of the way of the farmer and you'll still get an attractant/ food source for animals. And it wouldn't be a big expense for you or the farmer.
|
|
|
|
|
