|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
68 members (Frankie, Sasquatch Lives, Joe4majors, OutdoorsAL, Mbrock, quailman, SwampHunter, scrape, Skillet, Ray_Coon, Ryano, DGAMBLER, Johnal3, Bake, Fattyfireplug, Catbird, Gobble4me757, hoggin, top cat, hunterturf, jmj120, AU coonhunter, Chancetribe, dave260rem!, hallb, hunter84, Okalona, bn163, dirt, Floorman1, bassmaster95, TCG5, Captain Howdy, Reptar, jprice, Big AL 76, murf205, Brent, Cedar, Bigem1958, Dilbert, rkt, FNG68, doublefistful, Bread, !shiloh!, Tall Dog, Richard Cranium, cdaddy14, TroyBoy1988, mjs14, MS_Hunter, SC53, brandonwells55, canine933, DryFire, taggedout, Ruger7mag, canvasback, SnipeHunter, 8 invisible),
1,024
guests, and
0
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,180
14 point
|
|
14 point
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,180 |
Those that set the 3 buck limit are the ones who determined how many everyone "gets". Thats correct, everyone gets the same amount of the public wildlife resource. It does not matter how many acres you own, the way it should be. So a family of 4 that owns 40 acres should kill 12 off that land. The individual that owns 10,000 should kill 3 because that is fair. Or do you suggest the guy with 10,000 should let the family of 4 come over to his place and kill their deer on his land? Maybe we should make some sort of regulation about that....just to be fair. I thought the limit had something to do with management. If it's about fairness and equal distribution, then we are going to need a whole new set of regulations. 2. to the other "hypothetical situation" of one hunter hunting alone on 10,000 acres (I see a trend here of unrealistic scenarios, but anyway) and "only" being able to kill 3 bucks. Do you think that one person hunting 10000 acres, alone, is going to have that much more of an opportunity to kill more than 3 bucks, than a more realistic situation of 3-4 hunters hunting 3000 acres of family land? At the end of the day one person can't manage 10,000 acres anyway. It would either be a hunting Mecca or overrun with does. Either way the "one hunter" would likely be unaffected by a 3 buck limit, BUT, if they were and x hunter could have killed 3, 3 year olds and 3, 4 year olds (just to spread it around), which is worse, a hunter only being able to kill 3 bucks on 10000 acres or a hunter being able to kill a buck a day on 40 acres? Bottom line both are unrealistic and irrelevant. So now you tell me that limits on the 10000 acres is irrelevent but we should have one anyway. On the other hand, on 40 acres more power to them if they kill 12. I am saying each property should manage to its specific local situation. I guess I really don't get all this QDM stuff because I thought it was about science and doing what is right for your local conditions?
Last edited by jlccoffee; 08/08/12 11:33 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
