JR Holmes Oil Company </a </a Shark Guard REST NEST MATTRESS Mayer Insurance Services LLC
Serious Deer Talk
First fawn!
by ronfromramer - 08/27/26 10:50 AM
Cattle for deer habitat improvement
by CNC - 08/27/26 09:16 AM
New SOAs?
by !shiloh! - 08/26/26 12:26 PM
what deer see
by Frankie - 08/24/26 03:45 PM
Leafy suit ground hunting
by murf205 - 08/24/26 02:23 PM
LOGIN to view CLASSIFIEDS
Land, Leases, Hunting Clubs
Winston County club taking 2 members
by FreeStateHunter - 08/19/26 12:22 PM
NWA Hunt Club in Vernon/Sulligent area
by ScoutsOut - 08/18/26 07:54 AM
2 Spots Open Perry Co Club
by rja - 08/16/26 03:40 PM
Any clubs around Auburn looking for members
by Brady45 - 08/10/26 07:42 PM
Looking for a Club or Lease
by Turkeyhunter12 - 07/31/26 12:18 PM
August
S M T W T F S
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31
Who's Online Now
125 members (cullbuck, Peach, m97, Bonecollector58, 10 POINT, AU7MM08, quailman, aucountry, WC82, BobK, outdoorguy88, Wareagle277, Wes7777, Turkeyneck78, 3006bullet, metalmuncher, Ruger8point, Calvin, Captain Howdy, Mansfield, cch, Oscarflytyer, jmj120, GATA87, centralala, woodduck, Crawfish, Rainbowstew, Hunting-231, James, fi8shmasty, BACK40, Bruno, furnfeather, deadeye48, AU67Skeeter, inatree, Bowfish, Luxfisher, hoggin, BamaGuitarDude, MoeBuck, RCHRR, shootnmiss, turkey247, RidgeRanger, Jmfire722, 3bailey3, Jbf, RareBreed, JA, Ron A., Irishguy, Fattyfireplug, low wall, coldtrail, Fullthrottle, Narrow Gap, Jdkprp70, Mdees, jprice, Ryano, Jstewart, lpman, Swamp Monkey, Jweeks, deerhunter_1, aubigmac, Bigwhitey, M48scout, Kang, BhamFred, janiemae, hunter84, Chaser357, CNC, healy4au, Gobble4me757, trlrdrdave, brett.smith, globe, BAR II .270, AU coonhunter, Jay512, Darrylcom, MountainTopHunter, akbejeepin, wareagle22, mzzy, Jotjackson, abolthunter, BD, Emuckfwa, mdavis, hunterturf, rblaker, Tmoore8462, sanderson, SC53, Squadron77, bamacamp, CAM, beano1, Livintohunt19, somedude, odocoileus, Ridgehunter36, Fishduck, 3blades, StateLine, Cactus_buck, mw2015, LostinTX, Cbonner15, desertdog, 10 invisible), 802 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 14 15
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 12,855
Likes: 42
Booner
Booner
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 12,855
Likes: 42
Originally Posted by abolt300
Originally Posted by turkey247
Originally Posted by ALFisher
Maybe these data have something to do with the changes proposed:

2020 Season Totals

16,651 gobblers total harvest reported to Game Check

Private land: 15,228

Public land total: 1,423

WMA: 631

Federal: 401



2019 Season Totals

10,854 gobblers total harvest reported to Game Check

Private land: 9,875

Public land: 979

that's a big swing.


Killing more birds is a good thing. I’m not even sure how to spin that negative. They were gobblers, not hens.


More than likely it is purely a function of Covid 19 and people being home and not at work.



That could have had some effect, but there were a lot of us saying before the season that we had a record number of turkeys and I thought the season proved that. I can tell you Covid didn't have any impact on my hunting, nor that of anyone who I talk with about turkey hunting. It probably got more beginner types into the woods, but those folks usually save more than they kill. Chuck had the nerve to say that we killed more because the season started later. Does that make any sense?


All the labor of man is for his mouth, and yet the appetite is not filled.
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 11,919
Booner
Booner
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 11,919
Originally Posted by ALFisher
Lemme voted against the motion to reduce from 5 to 4 last time this issue came up. What's changed? What new data do they have out there? In fact, last time, the motion had a only 3 or 4 supporters, I think.

One of the problems in Alabama is lack of solid scientific data regarding population and harvest rate. Most of the people who read this board won't use Game Check to report turkeys, but then complain that the government doesn't know how many turkeys are out there. Well, if folks reported their kill, we would have a better idea. Far more people use Snapper Check than Game Check. I don't know why. Almost 50 percent of fishermen/women use Snapper Check. Last time I looked, around 10 percent used Game Check to report turkey harvest. It may be better this year. I don't know.

My point is that if we don't want what we perceive to be arbitrary decisions, then (1) we must get more involved, and (2) we must give the CAB and the good, hard-working folks at DCNR the tools and data they need to make decisions. My experience with people at DCNR is that they want to make good decisions based on science, and they want to give hunters the most opportunities they can while ensuring that we have a solid population. We need to do our part to give them the data they need and then participate in the process.
Liberalism/brainwashed HORSECHIT.


"The only reason I shoot a 3.5" shell for turkeys is because they don't make a 4" one." - t123winters
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 743
4 point
4 point
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 743
Quote
... but then complain that the government doesn't know how many turkeys are out there. Well, if folks reported their kill, we would have a better idea. ...
So you're in the government ? Who'd a thunk it?


A friend, the Bible and a banker will get you though about anything.
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 31,576
Likes: 134
Grumpy Old Man
Grumpy Old Man
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 31,576
Likes: 134
Government don't need to know how many turkeys we have.
All they need to do is stay out of the way, and let the landowners and hunters manage the turkey population like we been doing for decades.


I hate making a good first impression. There’s no way I can keep that shit up.
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 658
A
4 point
4 point
A Offline
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 658
I'm not in the government. Never have been. Someone will have to explain to me how science is liberalism/brainwashed horsechit and then come up with a better way to manage our wildlife. last time we just left people to their own devices with no rules, we overhunted deer and turkeys and ducks till they weren't worth hunting anymore. I don't want to go back to those days.

Joined: May 2013
Posts: 4,588
10 point
10 point
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 4,588
Originally Posted by Clem
Originally Posted by poorcountrypreacher
We had way better numbers in the days of the hunter survey. It seems like some folks here might have predicted this would happen. smile




Now, now, don't be mentioning the statistically valid, accepted survey that worked for more than 50 years.

We can't have any thoughts about The Before Times. Only what is The Now Times, with mandatory data checking systems and compliance. You shall submit.



You Shall Bend The Knee!!


Carrying a gun isn't comfortable; but at times it is comforting

"Cause the cause for the pause you think you see is really concentration on the steel” NonPoint
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 31,576
Likes: 134
Grumpy Old Man
Grumpy Old Man
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 31,576
Likes: 134
Landowners are better stewards of the resources than government.
Of course chucky doesn't believe that because landowners don't have to purchase the king's license.


I hate making a good first impression. There’s no way I can keep that shit up.
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 11,919
Booner
Booner
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 11,919
Originally Posted by ALFisher
I'm not in the government. Never have been. Someone will have to explain to me how science is liberalism/brainwashed horsechit and then come up with a better way to manage our wildlife. last time we just left people to their own devices with no rules, we overhunted deer and turkeys and ducks till they weren't worth hunting anymore. I don't want to go back to those days.
If you don’t have scientific knowledge enough to understand how statistically-valid sample sizes, as utilized in the hunter surveys the state successfully used for decades, and then subsequently advocate for requiring 100% reporting of harvest data via this current gestapo game-check government waste of unnecessary dollars bullchit, then you need to just shut up. Because you sound like a good-idea fairy, decisions based on feelings instead of facts, bleeding-heart liberal idiot. It aint required to determine accurate harvest estimations and corresponding trends accordingly. Period.

Last edited by JUGHEAD; 08/26/20 04:20 PM.

"The only reason I shoot a 3.5" shell for turkeys is because they don't make a 4" one." - t123winters
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 658
A
4 point
4 point
A Offline
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 658
Let's see - count every turkey killed (game check), or "assume" you have a valid sample size and method (hunter survey). Which one would give you a more accurate description of how many turkeys are killed? Obviously the first one. But then again, calling people idiots and game check gestapo-style is just easier. I love how people just immediately go to name calling rather than have a rational discussion. And no, I do not favor making decisions based on feelings and ignoring facts. that would not be smart. Nor am I some bleeding-heart liberal. Discussing it here is probably pointless. Just show up at the next CAB meeting and let them know. That's the only discussion that matters.

Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 658
A
4 point
4 point
A Offline
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 658
Originally Posted by Out back
Landowners are better stewards of the resources than government.
Of course chucky doesn't believe that because landowners don't have to purchase the king's license.


I assume this means you are against seasons or bag limits of any kind whatsoever. Let the landowner set his/her/its (in the case of a corporation) own season, bag limit, etc?

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 11,919
Booner
Booner
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 11,919
Originally Posted by ALFisher
Let's see - count every turkey killed (game check), or "assume" you have a valid sample size and method (hunter survey). Which one would give you a more accurate description of how many turkeys are killed? Obviously the first one. But then again, calling people idiots and game check gestapo-style is just easier. I love how people just immediately go to name calling rather than have a rational discussion. And no, I do not favor making decisions based on feelings and ignoring facts. that would not be smart. Nor am I some bleeding-heart liberal. Discussing it here is probably pointless. Just show up at the next CAB meeting and let them know. That's the only discussion that matters.
Again....zero understanding of the science and mathematics associated with statistically-valid sampling, confidence intervals, etc. If you did understand it, you would logically advocate differently (especially if you claim to be conservative whatsoever). Don’t feel alone though, Chuck Syke’s stupid arse doesn’t understand it either and he is in charge of all of it.

Last edited by JUGHEAD; 08/26/20 04:44 PM.

"The only reason I shoot a 3.5" shell for turkeys is because they don't make a 4" one." - t123winters
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 17
10 point
10 point
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,449
Likes: 17
I think these pointy headed jackasses that want to arbitrarily change rules, limits, seasons, etc. need to get their butts out of their offices and hit the woods.
Apparently, we had a excellent hatch year in my neck of the woods. I was mowing roads and food plots yesterday and saw more turkeys than I've seen in a good while.
Making changes just for the sake of change never works out well

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 11,919
Booner
Booner
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 11,919
Originally Posted by ronfromramer
I think these pointy headed jackasses that want to arbitrarily change rules, limits, seasons, etc. need to get their butts out of their offices and hit the woods.
Apparently, we had a excellent hatch year in my neck of the woods. I was mowing roads and food plots yesterday and saw more turkeys than I've seen in a good while.
Making changes just for the sake of change never works out well
We have had great hatches two years in a row in the northern part of the state.
The one two years ago was amazing. More hens and 2 year old gobblers than you could shake a stick at last year. I’m really looking forward to next spring. If they open it up on April 1st, I will really enjoy hunting em by myself about the last 10 days of March.


"The only reason I shoot a 3.5" shell for turkeys is because they don't make a 4" one." - t123winters
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,764
Likes: 36
14 point
14 point
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,764
Likes: 36
Originally Posted by JUGHEAD
Originally Posted by ronfromramer
I think these pointy headed jackasses that want to arbitrarily change rules, limits, seasons, etc. need to get their butts out of their offices and hit the woods.
Apparently, we had a excellent hatch year in my neck of the woods. I was mowing roads and food plots yesterday and saw more turkeys than I've seen in a good while.
Making changes just for the sake of change never works out well
We have had great hatches two years in a row in the northern part of the state.
The one two years ago was amazing. More hens and 2 year old gobblers than you could shake a stick at last year. I’m really looking forward to next spring. If they open it up on April 1st, I will really enjoy hunting em by myself about the last 10 days of March.

I’ll go with ya! I hate for you to be out there alone and something bad happen



Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 11,919
Booner
Booner
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 11,919
Originally Posted by sj22
Originally Posted by JUGHEAD
Originally Posted by ronfromramer
I think these pointy headed jackasses that want to arbitrarily change rules, limits, seasons, etc. need to get their butts out of their offices and hit the woods.
Apparently, we had a excellent hatch year in my neck of the woods. I was mowing roads and food plots yesterday and saw more turkeys than I've seen in a good while.
Making changes just for the sake of change never works out well
We have had great hatches two years in a row in the northern part of the state.
The one two years ago was amazing. More hens and 2 year old gobblers than you could shake a stick at last year. I’m really looking forward to next spring. If they open it up on April 1st, I will really enjoy hunting em by myself about the last 10 days of March.

I’ll go with ya! I hate for you to be out there alone and something bad happen
Come on my friend! Should be plenty of room!!! 🤣👍🏻


"The only reason I shoot a 3.5" shell for turkeys is because they don't make a 4" one." - t123winters
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 639
O
4 point
4 point
O Offline
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 639
Originally Posted by JUGHEAD
Originally Posted by ALFisher
I'm not in the government. Never have been. Someone will have to explain to me how science is liberalism/brainwashed horsechit and then come up with a better way to manage our wildlife. last time we just left people to their own devices with no rules, we overhunted deer and turkeys and ducks till they weren't worth hunting anymore. I don't want to go back to those days.
If you don’t have scientific knowledge enough to understand how statistically-valid sample sizes, as utilized in the hunter surveys the state successfully used for decades, and then subsequently advocate for requiring 100% reporting of harvest data via this current gestapo game-check government waste of unnecessary dollars bullchit, then you need to just shut up. Because you sound like a good-idea fairy, decisions based on feelings instead of facts, bleeding-heart liberal idiot. It aint required to determine accurate harvest estimations and corresponding trends accordingly. Period.


It never ceases to amaze me how few grasp this. What’s more, I’m pretty sure that Chuckie and company still have to sample to correct for noncompliance bias. Either that or they pull it out their rear when estimating reporting compliance rates.

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 27,503
Likes: 29
3
Talking Turkey
Talking Turkey
3 Offline
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 27,503
Likes: 29
This smells of follow the money

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 31,576
Likes: 134
Grumpy Old Man
Grumpy Old Man
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 31,576
Likes: 134
Originally Posted by 3toe
This smells of follow the money

If you a question about today's DCNR, the answer is MONEY.
Whatever the question, the answer is MONEY.


I hate making a good first impression. There’s no way I can keep that shit up.
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 12,855
Likes: 42
Booner
Booner
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 12,855
Likes: 42
Originally Posted by ALFisher
Let's see - count every turkey killed (game check), or "assume" you have a valid sample size and method (hunter survey). Which one would give you a more accurate description of how many turkeys are killed? Obviously the first one. But then again, calling people idiots and game check gestapo-style is just easier. I love how people just immediately go to name calling rather than have a rational discussion. And no, I do not favor making decisions based on feelings and ignoring facts. that would not be smart. Nor am I some bleeding-heart liberal. Discussing it here is probably pointless. Just show up at the next CAB meeting and let them know. That's the only discussion that matters.



No name calling from me - I've been trying to explain to folks for the past 20 years that the hunter survey was scientifically valid within the margin of error. It didn't give you the exact number, but it was close enough to make good decisions on setting seasons and limits. Every branch of science uses random sampling, and I never saw any reason to believe that we weren't getting good numbers.

But for a system like GC to give usable numbers, you need every hunter to participate, and that's just not gonna happen.

But the issue with the hunter survey from the dcnr point of view was that it did nothing for enforcement. If your ultimate goal is to cut way back on the season and limits, then you want an enforcement tool, and GC is it. We said this was the goal when it started and it all seems to be right on schedule. But it hasn't passed yet. Write your CAB member and tell him what you think.


All the labor of man is for his mouth, and yet the appetite is not filled.
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 658
A
4 point
4 point
A Offline
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 658
Originally Posted by poorcountrypreacher
If your ultimate goal is to cut way back on the season and limits, then you want an enforcement tool, and GC is it. We said this was the goal when it started and it all seems to be right on schedule. But it hasn't passed yet. Write your CAB member and tell him what you think.


Why would this be their ultimate goal unless some science (whether that be GC or valid sampling, I don't care which) supported it? That doesn't make any sense. If the answer is MONEY, then obviously there is more money in having a long season (see, for example, deer season). I just don't see anyone cutting the season short for the sake of cutting the season short, or cutting bag limits just for the sake of cutting bag limits.

Now, whether they actually have ANY scientific reason to cut the season shorter or to cut the bag limit is an extremely valid question. If they have, they haven't bothered to share that with us, other than to say vaguely that populations are down. What's their proof in that? That's what I want to see.

In my area, there seem to be lots of turkeys. This year's hatch seemed to be very, very good. Probably a combination of drier and warmer weather at hatch time. In my area, the weather around hatch time seems to make a huge difference.

Page 4 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 14 15

Moderated by  Brent, Dixiepatriot, Shaw 

Link Copied to Clipboard
http://www.aldeer.com/" Aldeer.com Copyright 2001-2026 Aldeer LLP.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.072s Queries: 55 (0.048s) Memory: 3.2076 MB (Peak: 3.5561 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-08-27 22:23:57 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS