Let's see - count every turkey killed (game check), or "assume" you have a valid sample size and method (hunter survey). Which one would give you a more accurate description of how many turkeys are killed? Obviously the first one. But then again, calling people idiots and game check gestapo-style is just easier. I love how people just immediately go to name calling rather than have a rational discussion. And no, I do not favor making decisions based on feelings and ignoring facts. that would not be smart. Nor am I some bleeding-heart liberal. Discussing it here is probably pointless. Just show up at the next CAB meeting and let them know. That's the only discussion that matters.
Again....zero understanding of the science and mathematics associated with statistically-valid sampling, confidence intervals, etc. If you did understand it, you would logically advocate differently (especially if you claim to be conservative whatsoever). Don’t feel alone though, Chuck Syke’s stupid arse doesn’t understand it either and he is in charge of all of it.
Last edited by JUGHEAD; 08/26/2004:44 PM.
"The only reason I shoot a 3.5" shell for turkeys is because they don't make a 4" one." - t123winters
