Originally Posted by Remington270


Well then that proves my point even more. Point is they're not hunting even remotely normal or average places, which is totally fine. But they're basing state policy on their large, contiguous, frequently burned, high input tracts of deer land. That's not where most folks hunt.


Yeah, I agree with you there….just not on the “need” to shoot them part. That term gets used all the time and I don't think we're actually stating the truth in the way its said. They "could" shoot some if they wanted to but not "need" to shoot.

I actually think it would be better to go back to more conservative doe days across the board like we used to have over chopping everybody up into a bunch of units like many want to do…trying to micromanage every county or whatever the case may be. Even within Bullock Co itself….there’s still a large difference in populations as you move from property to property and one part of the county to the other. I’m not talking about making super restrictive but stay on the side of playing conservative and anyone who wants to do other can go through a DMAP….Heck I imagine many of the folks on these overrun properties don’t care anyways. They’re not there paying those type prices to whack and stack does.

Last edited by CNC; 03/04/20 01:51 PM.
Folks that know don't shoot old does........ wink