Originally posted by JackG:
Lots of arguments on here have merit. Thanks Barry for clarifying for everyone. And those that complain about the the public land for BHA use, did you call your state representative, or did you check into how much money was spent in the past or will be spent in the future on these hunts that was taxpayers.
Research a lot of items and things will become clearer.
It always surprises me on how people view things. "For BHA use", is an interesting comment. Yes, the hunters have to be BHA members to hunt this year, but the hunt is not for BHA use. But, I guess it could be viewed that way.
I do find it interesting that the hunt is much cheaper than it was in the past. It is costing the DCNR much less in labor and expense.BHA is doing all the preparation for the hunt (registration, proficiency test, mailing of permits, etc...) But, it still seems to chap some butts that part of the money goes to BHA.
I would have thought that the interested bowhunters would have been glad that:
1. The cost to the hunter was decreased
2. That they could shoot the proficiency tests on weekends and afternoons so they wouldn't have to take off from work to take the test like they did in the past
3. Save the DCNR money that they don't have to spend on selecting the hunters
4. And that their experience, success, and love of the sport of bowhunting would actually benefit them in being selected for the hunt.
But, I guess the ole saying about not being able to please everyone is true was again.
