boat
by jhix3734 - 05/20/25 01:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
85 members (MS_Hunter, mw2015, gman, Lil_Fella, Overland, Turkeyneck78, HBWALKER14, Mdees, Tall Dog, BAR II .270, Bulls eye, OutdoorsAL, UncleHuck, CarbonClimber1, Pwyse, CNC, Tree Dweller, akbejeepin, wareagul, Joe4majors, Huntn2feed5, hamma, claybird, foldemup, Safetyman, BCLC, Kemosabe, Okatuppa, USeeMSpurs, Ron A., hallb, sumpter_al, Peach, 7PTSPREAD, Lead Poison, jprice, Dubie, Cedar, BACK40, coldtrail, WMEC615, alhawk, Paddlejon, jw706, donia, BayedUp, hunter84, deerchop, BentBarrel, Chad Burnette, 3Gs, dave260rem!, slim68, GomerPyle, bfoote, Hunt4Jesus, jacannon, eclipse829, !shiloh!, BearBranch, Young20, Butchman205, Radaralph, WPZJR, Bigem1958, JibJab, TCG5, JSanford1974, BC_Reb, HSV. HUNTER, RCHRR, BPI, Snuffy, Dixiepatriot, Jmkiper, 000buck, scott and deb, 8 invisible),
1,577
guests, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,967
8 point
|
8 point
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,967 |
Can’t have nothing nowadays. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670
Leupold Pro Staff
|
Leupold Pro Staff
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670 |
Until you have proof the neighbor is hunting your property, you have no case! It's his property and he can do as he pleases. You are wrong to put up a feeder where you did! That's the way I see it. There's only one neighbor trying to prevent the other from legally hunting his own land. If I owned the side with the shooting house,I would move and put a trailer park in just as close to the line as I could get it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,279
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,279 |
They already have a trailer park to some extent but at least they are up on the road. If that bean field could be anywhere else on the property it would be but there are only about 30 acres of good row crop land on the place and unfortunately thats where its at. The main n/s road I have to travel to get pretty much anywhere and the road my wife and I take walks on run parallel and along the line which is what he is hunting. Thats a little concerning to me, also. Anyway the feeder actually did not have any corn in it so he is in no immediate peril. The thread has been eye opening. Its amazing there are so many line sitting losers in a place where everyone is always crowing about their high character and moral integrity.Good neighbors are invaluable. My south neighbor and I co-operate in every way to the benefit both us.But that is because we both follow the golden rule. Good neighbors don't hunt the line.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,690
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,690 |
I'm sure he pays property taxes all the way to the line, so he has every right to hunt, harvest timber, or whatever else is legal all the way to the line. Why not just put a high fence along that border to keep deer from crossing there? You would be in your right to do so and problem solved. It would keep "his" deer off your property.
Last edited by scrubbuck; 12/18/17 06:30 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,616
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,616 |
They already have a trailer park to some extent but at least they are up on the road. If that bean field could be anywhere else on the property it would be but there are only about 30 acres of good row crop land on the place and unfortunately thats where its at. The main n/s road I have to travel to get pretty much anywhere and the road my wife and I take walks on run parallel and along the line which is what he is hunting. Thats a little concerning to me, also. Anyway the feeder actually did not have any corn in it so he is in no immediate peril. The thread has been eye opening. Its amazing there are so many line sitting losers in a place where everyone is always crowing about their high character and moral integrity.Good neighbors are invaluable. My south neighbor and I co-operate in every way to the benefit both us.But that is because we both follow the golden rule. Good neighbors don't hunt the line. Keep yer butt down in Florida, loser. Pure out of state hunting mentality right here.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,182
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,182 |
Sounds like the op needs to just mind his own business, and worry about his own chit. My wife bitches about this kind of stuff
Last edited by Powpow65; 12/18/17 06:37 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 295
4 point
|
4 point
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 295 |
They already have a trailer park to some extent but at least they are up on the road. If that bean field could be anywhere else on the property it would be but there are only about 30 acres of good row crop land on the place and unfortunately thats where its at. The main n/s road I have to travel to get pretty much anywhere and the road my wife and I take walks on run parallel and along the line which is what he is hunting. Thats a little concerning to me, also. Anyway the feeder actually did not have any corn in it so he is in no immediate peril. The thread has been eye opening. Its amazing there are so many line sitting losers in a place where everyone is always crowing about their high character and moral integrity.Good neighbors are invaluable. My south neighbor and I co-operate in every way to the benefit both us.But that is because we both follow the golden rule. Good neighbors don't hunt the line. Says the guy who puts a feeder directly behind someones completely legal shooting house.. Isn't your bean field on the line? Do you hunt it?
I don't always hunt the line, but when I do, I make sure I'm close to my neighbor's 8 acre bean field.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 7
spike
|
spike
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 7 |
Just because you put a feeder on your side, does not restrict the use of the land on the other side of the line. Unless the neighbor shoots across the line there is no violation of law or regulation. Setting someone up and calling the GW is not neighborly either. GWs see this all of the time and most do not fall into the trap you are setting. Be a guy and go talk to your neighbor, if they do not move the stand you did what you could do. It's just a deer, relax and enjoy life. It even happens to GWs, you're not the Lone Ranger. Oh yeah if you ever plan on setting someone up, do not post your intent on social media. Not a wise thing to do.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 295
4 point
|
4 point
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 295 |
Just because you put a feeder on your side, does not restrict the use of the land on the other side of the line. Unless the neighbor shoots across the line there is no violation of law or regulation. Setting someone up and calling the GW is not neighborly either. GWs see this all of the time and most do not fall into the trap you are setting. Be a guy and go talk to your neighbor, if they do not move the stand you did what you could do. It's just a deer, relax and enjoy life. It even happens to GWs, you're not the Lone Ranger. Oh yeah if you ever plan on setting someone up, do not post your intent on social media. Not a wise thing to do. Strong second post, but with 4 years experience I would expect nothing less.
I don't always hunt the line, but when I do, I make sure I'm close to my neighbor's 8 acre bean field.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 11,774
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 11,774 |
I've seen private land owners bordering public land hang up mesh screen or plywood boards blocking views of their land from public view. Seen it on gas/poweline breaks blocking the view from roads also.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 11,809 Likes: 2
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 11,809 Likes: 2 |
I'm betting that 75% of the posters on this thread that are bashing Brad are not landowners and probably never will be. They do not understand the cost associated with owning and maintaining a decent sized tract of land especially if you are taking the time and effort to intensively manage it for wildlife and grow good deer.
The bashers are the types that would love to have someone like Brad next to them so that they could take advantage of his hard work and 'free load" off of his intensive management efforts while they do nothing but show up and hunt the property lines without doing anything at all $$$ wise to improve their own land and hunting opportunities. I understand exactly where Brad is coming from.
Last edited by abolt300; 12/18/17 07:36 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 7
spike
|
spike
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 7 |
 I like watching more than posting, because you can't lead a horse to water and make him drink.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 7
spike
|
spike
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 7 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670
Leupold Pro Staff
|
Leupold Pro Staff
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670 |
I'm betting that 75% of the posters on this thread that are bashing Brad are not landowners and probably never will be. They do not understand the cost associated with owning and maintaining a decent sized tract of land especially if you are taking the time and effort to intensively manage it for wildlife and grow good deer.
The bashers are the types that would love to have someone like Brad next to them so that they could take advantage of his hard work and 'free load" off of his intensive management efforts while they do nothing but show up and hunt the property lines without doing anything at all $$$ wise to improve their own land and hunting opportunities. I understand exactly where Brad is coming from. Yea,I get the frustration,but it comes from thinking that you have some kind of ownership or greater right to the deer because of what you invested to get them to your property. As long as the guy is hunting on his property and isn't otherwise breaking any laws,it's poor sportsmanship to try to prevent him from enjoying his property and hunting and managing,or not managing it any way he wants.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 11,809 Likes: 2
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 11,809 Likes: 2 |
I dont disagree that the other guy can do whatever he wants with his property. That is certainly within his rights. At the same time, if he's a brown it's down hunter and Brad is trying to grow big deer on his property, then Brad can't be faulted for doing what he wants to do to protect those deer he's growing.
Sounds like he has good neighbors on the other sides of his property with common management goals and this guy is the outlier. This guy can hunt like he wants but Brad can also run a 7' high game fence right down that line and a couple hundred yards past where the other guy's property line stops on either end and effectively move those deer off of him. If I remember correctly, the other guy has 200 acres. He could just as easily take a dozier and push him some shooting lanes a couple hundred yards out in his property and Brad probably wouldnt have an issue with it. He doesnt like the guy setting up his shooting house where he can shoot across the line (back of that house has an open shooting window facing Brad's property) when Brad is not there and I dont blame him for not liking it.
Last edited by abolt300; 12/18/17 08:04 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 594
4 point
|
4 point
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 594 |
Maybe it's just an observation stand and not a kill stand? Need Whild Bill to chime in. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 21,285 Likes: 2
Impatient Stinky Britches Wearin’ Off-Roadin’ Guru
|
Impatient Stinky Britches Wearin’ Off-Roadin’ Guru
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 21,285 Likes: 2 |
because you can't lead a horse to water and make him drink. no, but you can drown the sumbich
There are 3 certainties in an uncertain world:
1. All Politicians Are Liars 2. All Gun Laws Are an Infringement 3. Taxation Is Theft
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,952
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,952 |
[quote= He doesnt like the guy setting up his shooting house where he can shoot across the line (back of that house has an open shooting window facing Brad's property) when Brad is not there and I dont blame him for not liking it. [/quote] That's the point I made earlier.
Last edited by Turkey_neck; 12/18/17 10:49 AM. Reason: To clarify
Would walk over a naked woman to get to a gobblin turkey!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,286
8 point
|
8 point
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,286 |
If a neighbor is a brown its down then its ok for Brad to do whatever he wants????
Thats crap guy! The animals belong to the people ( you and me ) and it is ethically and morally wrong to interfere with anybody elses hunt if they are hunting legally.
Everybody should have the right to do whatever they want up to the point, but, before they take away from another persons rights..
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670
Leupold Pro Staff
|
Leupold Pro Staff
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670 |
I dont disagree that the other guy can do whatever he wants with his property. That is certainly within his rights. At the same time, if he's a brown it's down hunter and Brad is trying to grow big deer on his property, then Brad can't be faulted for doing what he wants to do to protect those deer he's growing.
Sounds like he has good neighbors on the other sides of his property with common management goals and this guy is the outlier. This guy can hunt like he wants but Brad can also run a 7' high game fence right down that line and a couple hundred yards past where the other guy's property line stops on either end and effectively move those deer off of him. If I remember correctly, the other guy has 200 acres. He could just as easily take a dozier and push him some shooting lanes a couple hundred yards out in his property and Brad probably wouldnt have an issue with it. He doesnt like the guy setting up his shooting house where he can shoot across the line (back of that house has an open shooting window facing Brad's property) when Brad is not there and I dont blame him for not liking it. That's still the same mentality that he owns the deer that he is growing. It doesn't matter at all what size deer the neighbor wants to shoot as long as they are legal deer. I'll say it again. There is no proof here that anyone is doing anything illegal,but only one hunter is trying to prevent another hunter from legally hunting on his own property. That's what it boils down to no matter what justification is made for it. Now,what would be great is if both guys could sit down and discuss with each other why they feel like they do and why they are doing what they are doing without getting angry with each other.
|
|
|
|
|