We got into this in another thread, but here's my take; As to the merits of the case, it was clearly discrimination under the STATE law, but the way I see it is; does the state law trump the baker's right to religious freedom? Homosexuality is not a protected class under federal law, only in certain states, but freedom from religious persecution is federally protected. If this was on a playground you would have two kids yelling that "my discrimination is bigger than yours."
so basically that scenario and ruling could only happen in a few states?
