I'm still wondering why the stare/DCNR cares if someone kills 3 bucks over corn that was poured out or 3 bucks over corn that was planted. So if a farmer plants a field then I by good fortune can lease his land and hunt it when he cuts it and kill deer, am I better than the guy that bought it poured it out and killed a deer.
I can understand wishing everyone would put in some more "shoe leather" time and scout more but the same people that do that now will continue to do so and the ones that don't won't. It's not for me to decide how others want to invest their time and resources into hunting but I can't for the life of me understand the corn rule.
