He pillaged, raped, and robbed his way through Georgia. What food & crops he didn't steal, he destroyed. He spoilt the fields with salt to keep crops from being grown again. The number of raped & sodomized women were uncountable. He shot children because they cried and annoyed him. He broke the legs of any visibly healthy men for 60 miles wide across Georgia.
Any attempt at defending him is telling.
You stated the HE shot children because they cried and annoyed him.
So Fellman read a letter by a lady stating that he had it done. Fellman also said he salted fields which logistically is bullshit. So I call bullshit. Essentially they may have caused some grass to brown and dick up their Croquet game.
You also tell me he broke the legs of every healthy male for 60 miles. I call bullshit.
You say the rapes were too many to count. Delorenzen or whoever tells me I can read about them in the South Carolina documents but I can find only 1 instance. You came up with about 6, most from a newspaper writer and Lord knows they were never prone to exaggeration.
So now I can add to my list of him being compared to Marques de Sade by the Europeans and now they were blowing smoke in Nun's faces. While socially unacceptable it doesn't fit a war crime.
I don't deny they wrecked havoc and he was a little careless with the matches but again, you offer no proof of these things you claim. You copy and paste opinion from some blog and a guy that studies economics. None offer footnotes or bibliography to show their work. They wouldn't even pass as acceptable if you offered them as reference on a High School Paper.
