|
|
Guns
by Bmyers142 - 05/09/25 05:23 PM
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
31 members (akbejeepin, Jotjackson, Tigger85, Captain Howdy, Moss, leroyb, Booner Hunter, triggerfish, BCLC, farmerjay, M48scout, Bronco 74, LRNberg70, Stewart36567, Brian_C, BamaFan64, RedneckNinji, donia, DThrash, woodduck, ronfromramer, hootn, Dubie, dave260rem!, WDE, 4Tigers, 7PTSPREAD, 4 invisible),
1,080
guests, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 14,393
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 14,393 |
i have a nikon prostaff couple of them 3x9x40 (no bdc) i hunt with . they do fine for me . i ordered form walmart. NikoPlex? They are better for shots for less than 100 yards. ok , i must ask where did you get that tid bit of info I'm wanting an upgrade not a lateral move. Nothing against the Prostaff but I'm sure my VXI is comparable if not superior. stay where you are at http://swfa.com/Leupold-35-10x40-VX-3i-Riflescope-P91600.aspxI plan on getting this for around $300 shipped and putting it in a DNZ mount.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 253
4 point
|
4 point
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 253 |
I've got a 50mm Zeiss Conquest 3-9, like new, if you're interested. PM me. Im trying to avoid going into a 50MM objective lens if I can. The VX3i is looking like the likely choice if I do end up deciding to upgrade. Just curious. Why are you avoiding a 50mm? Not enough clearance on your gun?
The buck stops here.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,510
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,510 |
Many folks like smaller objectives. I personally feel some of the bigger scopes make it difficult for proper cheek weld and sight alignment. Good glass and coatings trumps objective size every time.
"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." Thomas Jefferson
"I ask, who are the militia? They consist of now of the whole people, except a few public officers." George Mason
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 14,515
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 14,515 |
i have a nikon prostaff couple of them 3x9x40 (no bdc) i hunt with . they do fine for me . i ordered form walmart. NikoPlex? They are better for shots for less than 100 yards. ok , i must ask where did you get that tid bit of info Frankie, just on the reviews of the BDC versus Nikoplex. Most of the reviewers suggested that the BDC was better at judging further distances because of the line-distance markings in the reticle. The BDC reticle markings interfered with the FOV at distances less than 100 yards.
"The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he loves what is behind him." -G. K. Chesterton
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 14,393
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 14,393 |
I've got a 50mm Zeiss Conquest 3-9, like new, if you're interested. PM me. Im trying to avoid going into a 50MM objective lens if I can. The VX3i is looking like the likely choice if I do end up deciding to upgrade. Just curious. Why are you avoiding a 50mm? Not enough clearance on your gun? I find the 50MM scopes to be unsightly. Mainly a preference thing but also they do raise the scope up a good bit usually to get the clearance.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 225
4 point
|
4 point
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 225 |
I read once that the human eye can only use the light from a 44mm objective anyway. But I always seem to see better in low light with a 50.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 18,162
Old Mossy Horns
|
Old Mossy Horns
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 18,162 |
i have a nikon prostaff couple of them 3x9x40 (no bdc) i hunt with . they do fine for me . i ordered form walmart. NikoPlex? They are better for shots for less than 100 yards. ok , i must ask where did you get that tid bit of info Frankie, just on the reviews of the BDC versus Nikoplex. Most of the reviewers suggested that the BDC was better at judging further distances because of the line-distance markings in the reticle. The BDC reticle markings interfered with the FOV at distances less than 100 yards. things is most average deer calibers is good sighted in at 200 is dead on hold out to 300 to 350 . saying the bdc is better is just not right . i dont like them , to much junk . you got to find just which dot to use and in a hurry that could cause a problem . really they are worthless each dot does not represent a 100yards . me i would prefer a range finder just my opinion
Last edited by Frankie; 04/20/16 12:42 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670
Leupold Pro Staff
|
Leupold Pro Staff
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,670 |
Ranging reticles are fairly worthless unless they are in the FFP. IMHO.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 253
4 point
|
4 point
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 253 |
Light gathering capability difference between a 50 and 40 is night and day though...literally. To each his own. They'll both kill a deer, so to each his own I guess.
Last edited by ALarcher; 04/21/16 06:54 AM.
The buck stops here.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 37,674
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 37,674 |
Light gathering capability difference between a 50 and 40 is night and day though...literally. To each his own. They'll both kill a deer, so to each his own I guess. Leupold engineer told me all other things equal, difference from 40mm to 50mm is 1-2% more. Most say yer eyes can't detect that small amount. It's the quality of glass, number of lenses , polish and such that makes a scope. I don't own any over 40mm, prolly never will.
"Why do you ask"?
Always vote the slowest path to socialism.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 24,507
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 24,507 |
Light gathering capability difference between a 50 and 40 is night and day though...literally. To each his own. They'll both kill a deer, so to each his own I guess. I've had 40mm scopes that I could kill a deer with if there was a lick of moon light and I've had cheap 50mm scopes that I couldn't see a thing with 10 minutes before dusk. 2dogs has it right.
" I do view Jim Waltz as a really good Presidential candidate" Bama_Earl
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,510
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,510 |
Light gathering capability difference between a 50 and 40 is night and day though...literally. To each his own. They'll both kill a deer, so to each his own I guess. Wrong. Good glass and coatings trumps objective size every time. I own 50s, 44s, 40s and 32s. Did a test a couple years ago. Took a 50mm Leupold VX3 and a 40mm Conquest. Side by side, both rifles were in sand bags. Started looking through both at various distances and equal power at 5:00 pm. Both remained equally bright and clear within 2 minutes of each other. However I lost the reticle in the VX3 10 minutes before the Conquest. Back to Leupold it went for a heavy duplex. Turned a perfectly good Abolt 280 5/8 moa shooter into a 1.25 moa gun. Long story short, both were about equal in clarity and brightness well beyond "legal shooting light" whatever that is. Hunted with a guy several years ago. He bragged about his new hubble telescope looking scope and how much "light it gathered". In reality it was an el cheapo Chinese made $75 POS. All I know is that guy was back at camp 15+ minutes before me every evening. BTW, that scope fogged internally and the warranty was worse than the scope.
"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." Thomas Jefferson
"I ask, who are the militia? They consist of now of the whole people, except a few public officers." George Mason
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 20
spike
|
spike
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 20 |
I got one of the vortex diamondback 4-12x40 (30mm tube) riflescopes and really do not like it. The HP may be a whole lot better than the standard diamondback but I have been quite displeased with my scope, and I am a big fan of vortex optics.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 225
4 point
|
4 point
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 225 |
I think legal shooting light is 30 minutes after sunset and 30 minutes before sunrise. At least in Ga. & Texas.
Last edited by trackncur; 04/21/16 12:55 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 14,393
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 14,393 |
Received my scope last week, I ended up going with the Leupold VX3i 3.5-10X40 that I got for $312 shipped. The mount arrived today and I went with a medium Gamereaper. Really happy with the setup. After finals I'll be getting the scope dialed in and zeroed. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 18,162
Old Mossy Horns
|
Old Mossy Horns
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 18,162 |
 looks good
|
|
|
|
|