|
|
|
SPF
by Turkeyneck78 - 05/13/25 05:16 PM
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
62 members (Flyliner, Driveby, Bread, k bush, HappyHunter, Skinner, Irishguy, 000buck, CrappieMan, Crawfish, NoHuntin, cullbuck, Big AL 76, BigA47, catdoctor, Chaser357, TEM, Luxfisher, outdoorguy88, SC53, BC_Reb, CrimsonWSM, StateLine, Skullworks, Bruno, Tree Hanger, GATA87, Chiller, graydw1, Bustinbeards, Ruger7mag, Paint Rock 00, zwick, !shiloh!, Bmyers142, dustymac, jawbone, Fishminer91, SnipeHunter, ParrotHead89, rrice0725, jmj120, IMISSALDEER, rkt, COOTER, Dr595, Geeb, cartervj, Dean, DuckDown11, jaredhunts, Fullthrottle, Ten37, Mike32, JBray1985, Whiskey9, janiemae, 5 invisible),
954
guests, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,095
ishootatbux
|
ishootatbux
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,095 |
and a $1000 scope dosen't have chitt to do with KILLING deer......I can't think of a single instance in over 50 years of deer KILLING that a high end scope would of given me a deer kill where my Leupold didn't. THIS^^^^ I believe that's all most of us detractors are saying. I stated that there are spec differences between a $1,000 and $250 scope. But unless you are an optics engineer, you can't tell with your human eye, nor by the shooting advantage. In the end it's like he said above, I can't remember a single instance in 35 years of hunting where the scope mattered. I'm willing to concede that if you're out West, shooting at an elk at 600 yards in EXTREME low light conditions, then yes there's probably a worthwhile difference. But 99.99% of folks will never be in that position.
We were on the edge of Eternia, when the power of Greyskull began to take hold.
|
|
|
|
|