Originally Posted By: bill

Originally Posted By: Geno
Originally Posted By: bill

Originally Posted By: jbc
Originally Posted By: bill

Originally Posted By: jbc
No, I don't think either of your extreme cases should happen

I believe magazines can post any ad or not post any af they want,

I also think you realize no daycare is taking any 50 year old man.


Extreme? Who decides that?

You can choose your gender but not any other life options?

Your discrimination argument, for private business, falls apart under closer observation.


A 50 year old enrolling in my child's daycare is an extreme scenario. I just decided it.


But a man choosing to be a woman isn't?

My business, my rules. I decide who I serve or don't serve. That will lead to discrimination for some but that's part of being a free society. I can tell you that in my business I won't provide services to other business that are in direct contrast to my beliefs. That doesn't mean I won't provide services to a gay person but I wouldn't provide services to an abortion facility or a chapel that performed same sex marriages.

Just as you decided what was acceptable, in.your mind, business owners should have that same luxury.


Exactly the same as the department stores refusing to admit people of color.


So that I'm able to get a clearer picture of what you consider extreme, and grounds for discrimination, are there any lifestyles that I would have grounds to refuse service to?

Should the daycare be forced to accommodate the 50 year old that identified as a 6 year old girl? Before you dismiss that as ridiculous, think about how ridiculous choosing a gender identity seemed to society just 30 years ago.

Give me an example of qualified discrimination, in your opinion, if you believe there is such a thing.


Geno, I see you are participating in other threads but you appear to have abandoned this one. Do you have an answer to my question?


" I do view Jim Waltz as a really good Presidential candidate"
Bama_Earl