|
|
Guns
by Bmyers142 - 05/09/25 05:23 PM
|
|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
12 members (Bronco 74, coosabuckhunter, bhammedic84, Shmoe, TamaDrumhead, !shiloh!, Jtide, Holcomb, rrice0725, 3 invisible),
688
guests, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,377
14 point
|
14 point
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,377 |
Why not shorten or close the season in all of these areas that have such low (or seemingly declining) populations? Seems to be the solution for other game animals. Closing the doe season or shortening the doe season is two of the options that have been discussed......
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,689
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,689 |
Why not shorten or close the season in all of these areas that have such low (or seemingly declining) populations? Seems to be the solution for other game animals. Closing the doe season or shortening the doe season is two of the options that have been discussed...... I am not talking about doe season, but deer season. Some of the folks on here sound like they don't have huntable populations based on the lack of deer seen, photographed, ...
"Any way you look at it, most of the problems facing baboons can be expressed in two words: other baboons" - D.L. Cheney and R.M. Seyfarth
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,996
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,996 |
Why not shorten or close the season in all of these areas that have such low (or seemingly declining) populations? Seems to be the solution for other game animals. Closing the doe season or shortening the doe season is two of the options that have been discussed...... I am not talking about doe season, but deer season. Some of the folks on here sound like they don't have huntable populations based on the lack of deer seen, photographed, ... Killing males doesn't really effect the population. Killing females has a huge impact on population.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 181
3 point
|
3 point
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 181 |
Why not shorten or close the season in all of these areas that have such low (or seemingly declining) populations? Seems to be the solution for other game animals. Closing the doe season or shortening the doe season is two of the options that have been discussed...... I am not talking about doe season, but deer season. Some of the folks on here sound like they don't have huntable populations based on the lack of deer seen, photographed, ... Killing males doesn't really effect the population. Killing females has a huge impact on population. Killing antlered males doesn't effect the population that badly. Killing unantlered deer has a hugh impact on the population.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 181
3 point
|
3 point
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 181 |
Why not shorten or close the season in all of these areas that have such low (or seemingly declining) populations? Seems to be the solution for other game animals. Closing the doe season or shortening the doe season is two of the options that have been discussed...... Close the season on does. All seasons bow, muzzleloader and rifle. This needs to be done on all public land for sure.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,377
14 point
|
14 point
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,377 |
Why not shorten or close the season in all of these areas that have such low (or seemingly declining) populations? Seems to be the solution for other game animals. Closing the doe season or shortening the doe season is two of the options that have been discussed...... I am not talking about doe season, but deer season. Some of the folks on here sound like they don't have huntable populations based on the lack of deer seen, photographed, ... Killing males doesn't really effect the population. Killing females has a huge impact on population. Exactly......
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,377
14 point
|
14 point
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,377 |
Why not shorten or close the season in all of these areas that have such low (or seemingly declining) populations? Seems to be the solution for other game animals. Closing the doe season or shortening the doe season is two of the options that have been discussed...... I am not talking about doe season, but deer season. Some of the folks on here sound like they don't have huntable populations based on the lack of deer seen, photographed, ... That's what I love about people.....some love to go to extremes to try and make a point everything from kill them all to just close the whole season lol.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,689
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,689 |
Why not shorten or close the season in all of these areas that have such low (or seemingly declining) populations? Seems to be the solution for other game animals. Closing the doe season or shortening the doe season is two of the options that have been discussed...... I am not talking about doe season, but deer season. Some of the folks on here sound like they don't have huntable populations based on the lack of deer seen, photographed, ... That's what I love about people.....some love to go to extremes to try and make a point everything from kill them all to just close the whole season lol. No, it is not to make an extreme point. Look back through the posts in this thread and other others one here where people talk about how they get no deer on camera, see no deer, no evidence of deer eating food plots ..., if the populations are that low in those areas why wouldn't you give them every opportunity to recover or lessen the harvest pressure? It is done around the state with turkeys, some counties get 46 days, some 30, some even less, and some are not opened at all. The season limit for turkeys in all of those opened counties is the same, 5 gobblers, but hunters just have fewer days in the field to achieve their limit and hens are never allowed to be killed. I just don't understand why you wouldn't treat deer herds the same way if you KNOW (not think) that you have a problem in certain areas?
"Any way you look at it, most of the problems facing baboons can be expressed in two words: other baboons" - D.L. Cheney and R.M. Seyfarth
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 181
3 point
|
3 point
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 181 |
Why not shorten or close the season in all of these areas that have such low (or seemingly declining) populations? Seems to be the solution for other game animals. Closing the doe season or shortening the doe season is two of the options that have been discussed...... I am not talking about doe season, but deer season. Some of the folks on here sound like they don't have huntable populations based on the lack of deer seen, photographed, ... That's what I love about people.....some love to go to extremes to try and make a point everything from kill them all to just close the whole season lol. No, it is not to make an extreme point. Look back through the posts in this thread and other others one here where people talk about how they get no deer on camera, see no deer, no evidence of deer eating food plots ..., if the populations are that low in those areas why wouldn't you give them every opportunity to recover or lessen the harvest pressure? It is done around the state with turkeys, some counties get 46 days, some 30, some even less, and some are not opened at all. The season limit for turkeys in all of those opened counties is the same, 5 gobblers, but hunters just have fewer days in the field to achieve their limit and hens are never allowed to be killed. I just don't understand why you wouldn't treat deer herds the same way if you KNOW (not think) that you have a problem in certain areas? If you don't have money, you ain't getting quality hunting in this state. Just saw a post, that it would cost $5000.00 to join a club. The rich get the deer the poor get the shaft. I have a lifetime license and would only be required to spend 20.00 to hunt the WMAs. They ain't worth it. Public land is crap, herd shot to pieces.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 181
3 point
|
3 point
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 181 |
The biologist supposedly working to redistrict and reduce the doe harvest, just posted in the Jackson rut thread that he ain't killed a deer in two years. He's still going to blast the next deer he sees. May have even said doe. Deer herd is surely in trouble. They are celebrating the arrival of turkey hunting in April. The deer hunting is that bad. Sounds worse than I even thought.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 22,079
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 22,079 |
Just saw a post, that it would cost $5000.00 to join a club. The rich get the deer the poor get the shaft. I have a lifetime license and would only be required to spend 20.00 to hunt the WMAs. They ain't worth it. Public land is crap, herd shot to pieces. You're talking to the wrong folks if you think a club is going to cost you $5,000. More like $1,200.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,999
10 point
|
10 point
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,999 |
Codie- read before you look even dumber... Codie-
I'm not working on reducing anything. I posed a question to provoke thought and discussion, which it did.
Are you asking me to provide details of each property I have the opportunity to hunt/take an antlerless deer? I really don't think that falls under any part of being a state employee. If it does I'll be happy to oblige.
Since you asked...I will probably kill the first doe I see on the overpopulated property I have the opportunity to hunt in Coosa County and play my role in the very intense deer/ habitat management program. Anymore questions?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 581
4 point
|
4 point
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 581 |
The biologist supposedly working to redistrict and reduce the doe harvest, just posted in the Jackson rut thread that he ain't killed a deer in two years. He's still going to blast the next deer he sees. May have even said doe. Deer herd is surely in trouble. They are celebrating the arrival of turkey hunting in April. The deer hunting is that bad. Sounds worse than I even thought. I cannot believe this 10 year old troll has not been banned yet!!! Phucking ridiculous!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,974
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,974 |
If you don't have money, you ain't getting quality hunting in this state. Just saw a post, that it would cost $5000.00 to join a club. The rich get the deer the poor get the shaft. I have a lifetime license and would only be required to spend 20.00 to hunt the WMAs. They ain't worth it. Public land is crap, herd shot to pieces.
Check these happy hunters out, scroll thru the pics and tell me these bucks are crap. https://www.facebook.com/Alabama-Wildlife-and-Freshwater-Fisheries-Division-242269819151597/
“Socialism only works in two places: Heaven where they don't need it and hell where they already have it.” ― Ronald Reagan
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,575
8 point
|
8 point
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,575 |
Cut the two does a day out , do more to educate hunters on conservation and wildlife managment , the hunters safety course could do a liitle more in that regard . Anything to educate.
Last edited by RonBuck; 01/05/16 02:52 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,377
14 point
|
14 point
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,377 |
Why not shorten or close the season in all of these areas that have such low (or seemingly declining) populations? Seems to be the solution for other game animals. Closing the doe season or shortening the doe season is two of the options that have been discussed...... I am not talking about doe season, but deer season. Some of the folks on here sound like they don't have huntable populations based on the lack of deer seen, photographed, ... That's what I love about people.....some love to go to extremes to try and make a point everything from kill them all to just close the whole season lol. No, it is not to make an extreme point. Look back through the posts in this thread and other others one here where people talk about how they get no deer on camera, see no deer, no evidence of deer eating food plots ..., if the populations are that low in those areas why wouldn't you give them every opportunity to recover or lessen the harvest pressure? It is done around the state with turkeys, some counties get 46 days, some 30, some even less, and some are not opened at all. The season limit for turkeys in all of those opened counties is the same, 5 gobblers, but hunters just have fewer days in the field to achieve their limit and hens are never allowed to be killed. I just don't understand why you wouldn't treat deer herds the same way if you KNOW (not think) that you have a problem in certain areas? You do not have to close the season to rebuild the herd just close or severely restrict doe season/ limits and the rest will take care of itself. The State has had to do this before and it worked maybe too good in some areas. Just like when the started the liberal doe limit to reduce the herd. It worked and worked too good in some areas. There are happy mediums out there the state just has to be more proactive in those areas where there is need.
Last edited by bigt; 01/05/16 02:48 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,974
Freak of Nature
|
Freak of Nature
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,974 |
Cut the two does a day out , do more to educate hunters on conservation and wildlife managment , the hunters safety course could do a liitle more in that regard . Anything to educate. There is only 1 doe a day here in Colbert Co, might be that way thruout the State. I know 3 guys that averaged seeing over 15 does a day this past weekend, and one guy yesterday had 21 on the field with (1) 6 point. He's saving that field for his daughter. Only hunted that field a few times this whole season. We have plenty of does right here in the western end of Colbert.
“Socialism only works in two places: Heaven where they don't need it and hell where they already have it.” ― Ronald Reagan
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,377
14 point
|
14 point
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,377 |
Cut the two does a day out , do more to educate hunters on conservation and wildlife managment , the hunters safety course could do a liitle more in that regard . Anything to educate. There is only 1 doe a day here in Colbert Co, might be that way thruout the State. I know 3 guys that averaged seeing over 15 does a day this past weekend, and one guy yesterday had 21 on the field with (1) 6 point. He's saving that field for his daughter. Only hunted that field a few times this whole season. We have plenty of does right here in the western end of Colbert. That's why earlier in the thread we discussed the State managing the State in districts and not as a whole. There are places where the deer population in this state are evidently prospering and areas that are in trouble. Both areas should not be managed the same.....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 10,249
Booner
|
Booner
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 10,249 |
Have two one week gun seasons for either sex plus week of pw and keep it one a day.Have an either sex limit by county and go to a true tag system.
"The Heavens declare the glory of God;and the firmament sheweth his handiwork" Pslam 19:1
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 181
3 point
|
3 point
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 181 |
Would the hunters in this state be in favor of any changes to the current regs regarding doe harvests? If so, would "doe days" or a season limit, or both be something you would like to see? I don't care/concern myself with anything other than public land, and land near public land. I grew up hunting on the Talladega National Forest in the sixties and seventies when the only deer in the state were on the Forest. Lack of deer on private land concentrated all the hunters on the WMAs. They had three, two day gun hunts a year on Hollis and Choccolocca. The doe to buck ratio was probably 10/15:1. Only antlered deer with visible bone above the hairline were legal. The harvest was probably 90% of the yearling bucks born each year. The WMAs looked like pumkin patches, on these hunts. Hunters were every where. It was insane. I somehow managed to kill a trophy 3 and a half year old 8 point on 8 January 1972. The deer only weighed 115 lbs. but, at the time and under the management system he was a monster.
|
|
|
|
|