JR Holmes Oil Company </a </a Shark Guard REST NEST MATTRESS Mayer Insurance Services LLC
Serious Deer Talk
New SOAs?
by Beadlescomb - 08/25/26 10:50 PM
Cattle for deer habitat improvement
by desertdog - 08/25/26 10:48 PM
First fawn!
by ford150man - 08/24/26 06:58 PM
what deer see
by Frankie - 08/24/26 03:45 PM
Leafy suit ground hunting
by murf205 - 08/24/26 02:23 PM
LOGIN to view CLASSIFIEDS
Land, Leases, Hunting Clubs
Winston County club taking 2 members
by FreeStateHunter - 08/19/26 12:22 PM
NWA Hunt Club in Vernon/Sulligent area
by ScoutsOut - 08/18/26 07:54 AM
2 Spots Open Perry Co Club
by rja - 08/16/26 03:40 PM
Any clubs around Auburn looking for members
by Brady45 - 08/10/26 07:42 PM
Looking for a Club or Lease
by Turkeyhunter12 - 07/31/26 12:18 PM
August
S M T W T F S
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31
Who's Online Now
12 members (gregnbc, coosabuckhunter, Exhoosier, Stacey, dustymac, JD53, BrandonClark, odocoileus, Thread Killer, fish251, mcninja, 1 invisible), 702 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#4138847 05/28/24 01:12 PM
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 177
S
3 point
3 point
S Offline
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 177
Do you manage your bucks based off of points...6 point or better, 8 point or better etc or age...3 1/2 or older, 4 1/2 or older etc? Why?

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 10,279
Likes: 10
Booner
Booner
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 10,279
Likes: 10
Age Age Age…..no spots, BANG

Last edited by foldemup; 05/28/24 01:45 PM.

If you want to always win, never play anyone better than you!
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 13,750
Likes: 257
A
Booner
Booner
A Offline
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 13,750
Likes: 257
Age only. Managing by points gets most of your genetically superior bucks killed early in their lifespan and long before they have an opportunity to reach maturity and really show what kind of rack they are capable of producing as well as limiting their ability to pass on those superior high point count, genes. Also, having a point requirement normally limits/prohibits you from taking out older aged bucks with inferior racks that really need to go. 4 1/2 is a good rule of thumb as far as rack development because most bucks are at 80-90% at that age, but in AL, with the season length, out of whack sex ratio, rut stress, pressure, poaching and night hunting, and an overall lack of trigger restraint among the legal hunters, I've talked to a bunch of guys that are now backing off the 4.5 rule and going to 3.5's. They're getting tired of passing a pile of 115-135" or better 3 yr olds only to never see them again in older age classes. Managing for bucks in AL is a very frustrating endeavor and unless you control 5000 plus acres or hunt in a fence, your neighbors will have more of an impact on your management goals than you do. Most of Alabama simply will not pass a 90-100" 6 or 8 point, regardless of his age.

Last edited by abolt300; 05/28/24 04:35 PM.
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 29,071
Likes: 83
CNC Offline
Dances With Weeds
Dances With Weeds
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 29,071
Likes: 83
We'd have better age structure if everyone managed by "score" instead of age


Folks that know don't shoot old does........ wink
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 19,233
Likes: 27
Old Mossy Horns
Old Mossy Horns
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 19,233
Likes: 27
Originally Posted by CNC
We'd have better age structure if everyone managed by "score" instead of age




No,,,, I don't let a five year old 110 ,,, 120 walk . He's buger

Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 15,088
Likes: 149
B
BPI Offline
Old Mossy Horns
Old Mossy Horns
B Offline
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 15,088
Likes: 149
Originally Posted by CNC
We'd have better age structure if everyone managed by "score" instead of age


How can that be better ? Age structure managed by age would seem to be the logical process.

Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 29,071
Likes: 83
CNC Offline
Dances With Weeds
Dances With Weeds
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 29,071
Likes: 83
Originally Posted by BPI
Originally Posted by CNC
We'd have better age structure if everyone managed by "score" instead of age


How can that be better ? Age structure managed by age would seem to be the logical process.


Every buck in the woods has the potential to reach 3 ½ or 4 ½ and get shot because of it……..Only about 1/3 of them have the potential to reach 120 or 130 or whatever you decide……


Folks that know don't shoot old does........ wink
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 39,938
Likes: 130
Freak of Nature
Freak of Nature
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 39,938
Likes: 130

I'm REAL picky , I like age , big antlers , heavy weight , not broken up , close to the road ......................

This thread is useless without popcorn



"Why do you ask"?

Too many people spend money they don't have , on things they don't need, to impress people they don't know.







Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 24,103
Likes: 296
Freak of Nature
Freak of Nature
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 24,103
Likes: 296
Originally Posted by CNC
We'd have better age structure if everyone managed by "score" instead of age

Whataloadofchit


Dying ain't much of a living boy...Josey Wales

Molon Labe
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 39,938
Likes: 130
Freak of Nature
Freak of Nature
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 39,938
Likes: 130
Originally Posted by CNC
We'd have better age structure if everyone managed by "score" instead of age


I agree! 4X4 and 5X4 should be 140" min. 5X5 and more 150" min. laugh



"Why do you ask"?

Too many people spend money they don't have , on things they don't need, to impress people they don't know.







Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 10,972
Likes: 190
Fancy
Fancy
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 10,972
Likes: 190
Depends on the objectives of who’s hunting. Using a minimum point restriction is about the worst way to manage a deer herd. It does nothing to protect any age class or antler size of deer. It always leads to high grading. It’s about the only way that I refuse to manage a place. You can use any number of other antler criteria to protect most deer in whatever age class you want protected, like minimum main beam or inside spread, and even minimum score, but the BEST way is an age based criteria. Sorry CNC. 😜

The problem is getting everyone to agree on the age to protect, and the age of individual deer. At the end of the day, be reasonable and have fun.

Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 29,071
Likes: 83
CNC Offline
Dances With Weeds
Dances With Weeds
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 29,071
Likes: 83
Originally Posted by Mbrock
, but the BEST way is an age based criteria. Sorry CNC. 😜


Best way for accomplishing what??......I said score would create better age structure and it would.....


Folks that know don't shoot old does........ wink
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 330
4 point
4 point
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 330
Age based harvesting is the best way to allow your bucks with the most potential to reach said potential. Antler based harvesting results in the deer with the most potential being killed a couple years too early. Also doesn't allow for killing over-mature bucks with few points.


In a world of food plotters, be a habitat manager.
https://woodsandwhitetail.com/
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 10,972
Likes: 190
Fancy
Fancy
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 10,972
Likes: 190
Originally Posted by CNC
Originally Posted by Mbrock
, but the BEST way is an age based criteria. Sorry CNC. 😜


Best way for accomplishing what??......I said score would create better age structure and it would.....

In my experience the clubs who’ve implemented a minimum score only did so for so long, and decided to go in a different direction. One I know real well went to a 120” minimum and they all but stopped producing 140-150” deer because they killed every 120” 3-4 year old on the place every year. It is just another way to high grade. I’ve rarely seen it lead to higher age structure long term.

Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 10,381
Likes: 150
P
Glad He Doesn’t Have One
Glad He Doesn’t Have One
P Offline
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 10,381
Likes: 150
Here's a subject that hasn't been beat to death in the last 10 months...

Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 3,130
Likes: 15
10 point
10 point
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 3,130
Likes: 15
Originally Posted by Mbrock
Depends on the objectives of who’s hunting. Using a minimum point restriction is about the worst way to manage a deer herd. It does nothing to protect any age class or antler size of deer. It always leads to high grading. It’s about the only way that I refuse to manage a place. You can use any number of other antler criteria to protect most deer in whatever age class you want protected, like minimum main beam or inside spread, and even minimum score, but the BEST way is an age based criteria. Sorry CNC. 😜

The problem is getting everyone to agree on the age to protect, and the age of individual deer. At the end of the day, be reasonable and have fun.

It depends 🤣🤣🤣


To GOD be All the glory!!!
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 15,112
Likes: 52
Old Mossy Horns
Old Mossy Horns
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 15,112
Likes: 52
Age

And i shot one to young this year last minute of legal - just went off horn - messed up - shot future stud amd it stung some. I thought back thru scenario to learn and remember thinking his body was not real big. And the small body made the horns look really big

Age for me and the only last minute shooting needs to be if you sold on the body/age. If not - i dont need to shoot

And it is your hunt so it is about what you want to achieve - what makes you happy


Hunt the wind - leave it better than you found it - love your neighbor as you love your self
We need prayer for our country now more than ever
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 5,369
Likes: 48
12 point
12 point
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 5,369
Likes: 48

Rule #1 - be happy

Rule #2 - They are deer. Another one will be born this year or next. If you shoot the wrong one, the world will keep spinning.

Rule #3 - If you are managing less than 2500 acres, or are at/near the edge of said 2500 acres, that 2 year old may never be seen again on your property. Could get shot by a neighbor, hit by a log truck, or et by coyotes. If you shoot him, he will be replaced quickly, or see rule #2.

Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 39,938
Likes: 130
Freak of Nature
Freak of Nature
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 39,938
Likes: 130
Lota truth Huck.



"Why do you ask"?

Too many people spend money they don't have , on things they don't need, to impress people they don't know.







Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 15,088
Likes: 149
B
BPI Offline
Old Mossy Horns
Old Mossy Horns
B Offline
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 15,088
Likes: 149
Originally Posted by CNC
Originally Posted by BPI
Originally Posted by CNC
We'd have better age structure if everyone managed by "score" instead of age


How can that be better ? Age structure managed by age would seem to be the logical process.


Every buck in the woods has the potential to reach 3 ½ or 4 ½ and get shot because of it……..Only about 1/3 of them have the potential to reach 120 or 130 or whatever you decide……


If you're managing age structure alone , shouldn't that be the only indicator to do so ? Don't get me wrong, antler growth can help when ageing deer, but it's not entirely conclusive. Body size, physical appearance, etc, are even more conclusive IMO. 3-4 year old deer bumping 130 would be the exact reason NOT to go by antler growth alone, would it not ?

Last edited by BPI; 05/29/24 07:27 AM.
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
http://www.aldeer.com/" Aldeer.com Copyright 2001-2026 Aldeer LLP.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.4.33 Page Time: 0.063s Queries: 55 (0.040s) Memory: 3.1647 MB (Peak: 3.5597 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2026-08-26 08:35:35 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS